Transcript Highlights:

• I'll be voting.
• So that's a major, major addition to the bill. Seeing no further debate.
• I would not have voted for him.
• Why didn't use vote for Scott the enter and you know, do you have an explanation related to that vote
• Hell, yes. >> And by your vote, Mr.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Unfortunately, the Republican majority has blocked my amendment from receiving a floor vote today.
• vote and please vote consider their yes vote and please vote no.<02:51:37.279> We're<02:51:37.600
• This is a 15-minute vote. fiveminute votes. fiveminute votes.
• [Music] Does anyone ever wish to change their vote? Who's voted?
• Have all members voted? Does anyone wish to change the vote?

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Thursday, June 5, 2025, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• A no vote on this plan is a no vote for small business.
• vote. The yays and nays. vote. The yays and nays.
• fiveminute votes. fiveminute votes.
• Have all members voted? On this vote, the yeas are 190. Mr. Ciscomani votes aye. Mrs.
• Tran votes no. Mr. Lauro votes no. Mr. Murvan votes no. Mr. Mesmer votes aye. We're close.

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Tuesday, May 6, 2025, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:21:01.159> so<00:21:01.559> I'm already voted voted on and passed so I'm already
• voted voted on and passed so I'm I'm<00:21:01.919> going<00:21:02.000> to<00:21:02.240
• respectfully urge my colleagues to vote respectfully urge my colleagues to vote ought<00:26:58.760
• vote no, they are voting to allow a different motion.
• If you support voting down the committee amendment, you're going to vote no.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Baker votes aye. Baker votes aye. Swazinski. Swazinski votes aye. Swazinski votes aye.
• We do not need a majority of the votes to pass any amendment off the floor, Mr. Speaker.
• the vote count was when we voted on this?
• It is a vote against civil rights. It is a vote against the Constitution. Please vote no, members.
• Baker votes aye. Swazinski. Swazinski votes aye. Swazinski votes aye.

Transcript Highlights:

• Otherwise, we'll go to a vote.
• of a majority of all appointed committee members, excluding non-voting members, is required for a standing
• >> The affirmative vote of a majority of all appointed committee members excluding non-voting members
• The vote does not prevail.
• And so it has to—you need a majority of the voting members of the committee to take a bill off the table

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• vote of the county commissioners.
• Orange County's charter was amended in 2020, and there was a vote to require a majority plus one vote
• If we trust the same people to vote for us, then we should be able to trust the same people to vote yes
• and eliminates its outdated veto power. ensuring decisions are made by majority vote.
• I'm speaking for the majority of our city commission.

Transcript Highlights:

• And I do hope you would vote down on this bill and we all oppose it has you would vote down on this bill
• Please vote no on this bill. >> Thank you, sir.
• The bill passes. >> Members by your vote.
• He their vice either warning, please vote no on this.
• Members by your vote. We will show House Bill 431.

Transcript Highlights:

• Majority Leader Garcia is asking for an aye vote. Ms. Hadwick is asking for a no vote.
• All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote.
• All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote. Thank you.
• All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote.
• All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Summary: The Assembly convened after a quorum call, heard a prayer and Pledge of Allegiance, and approved the previous day’s journal. Members then handled several procedural motions, including a successful roll-call vote to suspend rules so the Public Safety Committee could set SB 73 for hearing; the motion passed 41-14. The chamber also welcomed several guest groups, including Placer County Sheriff’s Office leaders for its 175th anniversary, John Muir Charter Schools students, youth art contest winners from the 24th District, Oak Ridge High School’s national champion cheer team, and Casa Grande High School seniors visiting for civic education. On the floor, the Assembly adopted ACR 176 by Assemblymember Elhawary, recognizing April as Second Chance Month. Supporters emphasized rehabilitation, reentry barriers, and the importance of trauma-informed services, housing, education, and employment for formerly incarcerated people; the resolution received 55 coauthors and was adopted by voice vote. The Assembly also adopted HR 109 by Assemblymember Schiavo, honoring California’s janitorial and cleaning workforce, with members speaking about the essential, often unseen work of janitors and state building staff; it received 58 coauthors and passed by voice vote. Members then adopted ACR 119 by Assemblymember Ta, marking the 51st anniversary of Black April and honoring Vietnamese refugees, the fall of Saigon, and the sacrifices of Vietnamese and American service members. Speakers reflected on the trauma of displacement and the contributions of Vietnamese Americans in California; the resolution received 63 coauthors and was adopted by voice vote. The Assembly passed and retained numerous other file items, continued some measures, and adjourned until Monday, May 4 at 1 p.m.

Transcript Highlights:

• Chair votes yes. Any objections to consent?
• Chair votes Ouch. And Chairman right? Chair votes yes.
• The clerk votes yes. Representative Yes. The clerk votes yes.
• I would prefer that we consider that before we have a final vote on this.
• I would prefer that we consider that before we have a final vote on this.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• In addition, the bill must be approved by the majority of the delegation unless the delegation has a
• delegations require a unanimous vote, and some delegations require a majority of the House or the majority
• of the Senate to vote.
• vote.
• So whatever comes to you is at least a majority from the local delegation, if not more.

Summary: The Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee heard and passed two measures before receiving a staff presentation on the local bill process and local delegation meetings. HB 4007, by Rep. Snyder, would cap reimbursement for certain inmate emergency medical services in Martin County at 110% of the Medicare rate, with a higher cap if a provider shows it is operating at a loss. Snyder said the bill is intended to create predictability and save taxpayer dollars; members asked about fiscal effects and whether other counties could adopt similar language. Public testimony came in support from Martin County and related local officials, and the bill was reported favorably by a 17-0 vote. The committee also passed HM 4005, by Rep. Daly, which urges Congress to increase Florida National Guard force structure. Daly argued Florida’s troop allocation is outdated and inadequate for the state’s population and disaster demands, contributing to burnout and recruiting problems. Members asked about the basis for the current allocation, possible budget and infrastructure impacts, and the National Guard’s needs; there was no opposition or public testimony, and the memorial was reported favorably by a 17-0 vote. After the votes, Reps. Holcomb and Kendall gave a detailed presentation explaining how local bills differ from general laws, constitutional limits on local legislation, required local delegation meetings and notice, certification and economic impact forms, and amendment procedures. Members asked several process questions, including about multi-county delegations and Miami-Dade’s special status. The meeting ended with a few recognitions and adjournment before session.

Transcript Highlights:

• That's a recorded vote. Clerk will close the roll. Ayes 92, no 0.
• In terms of eight years, commencing on the date specified, vote yes.
• Those judges previously nominated in House Resolution 483, having received a majority of the votes cast
• Those judges previously nominated in House Resolution 484, having received a majority of the votes cast
• Those judges previously nominated in House Resolution 485, having received a majority of the votes cast

Keywords: March 13, 2026 - Regular Session, 976, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• . >> Uh, explain my hesitant I vote. [snorts] Um, it still counts as an I vote though, doesn't it?
• Can I explain my vote, >> I'm I'm a yes. Can I explain my vote, please?<00:41:15.680> Yes.
• . vote. vote.
• <00:45:58.079> Senate<00:45:58.240> bill one 10 I votes one n votes.
• Senate bill one 10 I votes one n votes.

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The committee first heard Senate Bill 173 from Senator David Givens, which would create a legislative review process for the state health plan and state plan amendments, modeled after the administrative regulations process. Givens argued the legislature should have a stronger policy role in reviewing the plan, saying the bill would allow lawmakers to find components deficient rather than approve them outright. He tied the proposal to Medicaid spending growth and projected enrollment changes, saying the state needs a new oversight tool. Committee members generally supported the concept, though Senator Berg expressed concern that the legislature lacks the executive branch’s healthcare expertise. The bill was reported favorably on a unanimous roll call vote. The committee then took up Senate Bill 137, sponsored by Chairman Meredith, which would create a pathway for certain internationally trained physicians to practice in Kentucky without repeating residency in the United States. Supporters said the bill is aimed at addressing Kentucky’s physician shortage, especially in rural areas, and cited projections of a statewide shortage of about 3,000 physicians by 2030 and a shortage of primary care doctors in particular. Testimony from Cicero Action and Baptist Health emphasized that many foreign-trained physicians are already fully trained, that residency slots are limited, and that the bill could help fill shortages in underserved counties while preserving quality through existing exams, ECFMG certification, English proficiency requirements, primary source verification, and mentoring/oversight. Several members raised questions and concerns. Senator Berg asked about verification, required exams, and oversight, and Senator Tishner raised concerns about fraudulent credentials in some countries and whether the bill could admit underqualified physicians. Witnesses responded that applicants would still have to pass the same exams, obtain ECFMG certification, and undergo primary-source credentialing and employer oversight. Supporters also argued the bill would not displace U.S.-trained physicians because it would use otherwise limited residency capacity more efficiently. After discussion, the committee adopted the bill and reported it favorably by unanimous vote.

Transcript Highlights:

• Chair Tipton votes aye.
• Chair Tipton votes aye.
• Please vote now. Thank you.
• Please vote now. Thank you.
• Please vote now.

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The committee first heard House Bill 305, which would clarify and expand a healthcare workforce bill to explicitly include physician assistants and dietitians in efforts to address shortages, especially in rural areas. Rep. Fleming said the change was intended to help with Medicaid-related needs such as diabetes care and noted a decline in dietitian internship applications. Rep. Roarx supported the bill, emphasizing the value of dietitians in helping patients make practical nutrition changes. The bill received a unanimous favorable expression, 14-0, and was reported to the House floor. The committee then considered House Bill 427, which would create statewide 60-credit-hour transfer pathways for high-demand bachelor’s degree programs under the Council on Postsecondary Education. Rep. Grossl explained the bill is meant to prevent students from losing major credit when transferring between KCTCS and four-year institutions, using nursing as an example. Questions focused on rigor, dual credit, how high-demand programs would be selected, and the July 1, 2026 implementation date; the sponsor said CPE and faculty would map curricula and align standards. The Kentucky Student Rights Coalition testified in support, saying the bill would help students complete degrees faster and make credits count toward majors. HB 427 also passed unanimously, 14-0, with favorable expression. The committee then took up House Bill 424, as amended by a committee substitute. Rep. Tipton said the substitute removed language allowing up to six-year contracts and instead set up a process for four-year contracts and periodic performance reviews for faculty, including presidents, at public postsecondary institutions. He said the bill is intended to give universities clearer authority to remove underperforming employees and be more efficient with taxpayer dollars. Several faculty witnesses opposed the bill, arguing it would erode tenure protections, create arbitrary performance standards, and harm recruitment, retention, and academic freedom. The committee adopted the substitute and heard testimony, but no final vote on HB 424 is shown in the transcript excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• Any no votes? 24 eyes. Thank you.
• Any no votes? San Buenav Ventura. Any no votes? >> 24<00:15:06.560> eyes.
• Majority members, please report to the majority caucus room not immediately after session.
• Majority members, please report to the majority caucus room not immediately after session.
• Majority members, please report to the majority caucus room not immediately after session.

Bills: HB9, SB2069, SB2342, SB2861, SB3123, SB2623, SB585, SB2211, SB2446, SB2919, SB2125, SB2116, SB2999, SB2656, SB2001, SB3169

Keywords: HB9, Hawaii Purple Heart state, Purple Heart, Purple Heart recipients, veterans, military, armed forces, service members, combat wounded, war veterans, military honors, state designation, symbolic legislation, honorary designation, Chapter 5 HRS, Hawaii Revised Statutes, military appreciation, veteran recognition, SB2069, Hawaii housing

Transcript Highlights:

• and 2,152 votes in favor and 1,115<00:58:33.480> votes<00:58:34.000> against<00:58:34.880
• /c><02:43:41.479> at<02:43:41.680> an majority vote of its members at an majority vote
• <02:59:34.520> to 2000 voted by a super majority to 2000 voted by a super majority to authorize
• don't know how they vote don't know how they vote uh<03:07:18.479> the<03:07:18.760> the
• to hold a vote?

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So with that, I vote yes. So with that, I vote yes.
• Members, by a vote of three ayes, two nays, you have voted to reject the nomination of Mary Foote as
• So with that, I vote yes. Members 5 votes. So with that, I vote yes.
• Members, very votes of three I's, two nays, you have voted to reject the nomination of Mary Foote as
• Health is a major component to what we will be voting on at some point this afternoon.

Summary: The Committee on Director Nominations met with four members present and approved the prior minutes without objection. Chair Jay Kaufman outlined the committee’s role in reviewing executive nominations and explained the hearing process for three nominees: Mary Foote for the Office of Economic Opportunity, Debbie Johnston for the Department of Health Services, and Chuck Bassett. Foote did not appear for her hearing, and members discussed her absence and alleged omissions in her disclosure materials, including prior service with Planned Parenthood-related organizations. The committee then moved to reject her nomination, and the motion passed 3-2, recommending that the full Senate reject Mary Foote. Debbie Johnston, nominee to lead the Department of Health Services, appeared and gave an opening statement describing her Arizona background, prior Senate staff work, and more than 20 years with the Arizona Hospital and Health Care Association. She said her priorities at ADHS include rebuilding trust in public health licensing, improving stakeholder engagement, standardizing rulemaking communication, addressing alleged religious discrimination and retaliation concerns in licensing, and using technology and AI to improve efficiency. In questioning, senators pressed her on her management style, conflict-of-interest safeguards given her prior industry role, enforcement priorities, budget pressures, behavioral health and assisted living oversight, and the department’s response to COVID-19. Johnston said she would follow statutes, recuse herself from enforcement matters involving former contacts, and resign if directed to carry out an unlawful policy. She also said the department does not regulate therapy itself, only facilities, and that it would rely on legal counsel regarding the governor’s conversion-therapy executive order and related federal civil-rights allegations. Several senators focused on public health trust and the department’s pandemic response, with Johnston acknowledging concerns about closures, data collection, and communication during COVID-19 while saying she would review past after-action materials and be better prepared in the future. Public testimony from stakeholders in aging services and health care strongly supported her confirmation, praising her accessibility, responsiveness, and collaborative approach. After testimony, the vice chair moved to recommend Johnston’s confirmation to the full Senate. The roll call was underway when the transcript ended, with several members voting aye and one member expressing reservations about her not reviewing the pandemic after-action report before another crisis occurs.

Transcript Highlights:

• With that, I vote aye.
• I vote no. Representative Biasucci. ...in our school system. I vote no. Representative Biasucci?
• Abeytia's testimony or vote explanation.
• With that, I vote aye. The vote is six ayes, five noes, and one absent.
• I vote no. Representative Hernandez? Mr. Chair, if I may explain my vote. Please proceed.

Keywords: 1182, all

Summary: The committee heard and voted on several education-related bills. Senate Bill 1422, which continues the Credit Enhancement Eligibility Board for 10 years to support the state’s credit enhancement program for charter school debt, received a due pass recommendation on an 8-1 vote. Senate Bill 1166, allowing county school superintendents to offer high school equivalency preparation through accommodation schools to 11th- and 12th-grade students age 16 and older, also passed 8-1 after testimony from county superintendents in support and one member opposing expansion to 11th grade. Senate Bill 1684, creating a private cause of action against public schools for failing to address known bullying that results in serious physical injury, drew the most opposition. The sponsor’s comments described it as a response to school inaction in bullying cases, including a referenced Chandler Unified student suicide. Opponents from the Arizona Trial Lawyers Association, Arizona Charter Schools Association, and Arizona Education Association argued the bill was constitutionally problematic, overly broad, lacked a definition of bullying, could expose schools to costly litigation, and could create liability for conduct outside school control. The committee held the bill without a vote. The committee also considered Senate Bill 1424, requiring annual age-appropriate firearm safety instruction in K-12 schools beginning in 2027-2028. Supporters said the bill teaches children to avoid touching firearms and alert an adult, while opponents argued it shifts responsibility from adults to children, should be handled by parents, and creates an unfunded mandate. The bill passed 6-5. Senate Bill 1475, barring students convicted of or admitting to specified serious offenses from participating in school-sponsored interscholastic activities, passed 6-5 after debate over juvenile rehabilitation, public safety, and the role of extracurriculars in helping students succeed. Senate Bill 1572, requiring Celebrate Freedom Week civics instruction, passed 6-5 amid debate over curriculum, age appropriateness, and whether it duplicated existing civics requirements. Senate Bill 1741, requiring districts and charters to allow release-time religious instruction and award credit under certain conditions, also passed 6-5 despite opposition from secular advocates who argued it undermines local control and promotes religion in public schools.

Transcript Highlights:

• I voted for it. I voted for it for years.
• I'm voting against the amendment. However, I will vote for the bill. I support the policy.
• I'm voting against the amendment. However, I will vote for the bill. Additional debate.
• If we all vote for the bill you told us not to vote for, don't worry.
• I had a vote. I'm sorry. By your vote, CS for HB 5503 is reported favorably.

Summary: The Appropriations Committee considered a large agenda of bills and reported several measures favorably. Early action included SB 6, a settled claim bill involving the Department of Children and Families and a trust for Leila Estrada and Sapphire Williams, and CS/CS/SB 1266, which creates a cybersecurity experiential learning and clearance-readiness program through the Department of Commerce and Cyber Florida. The committee also approved SB 532 on clerks of court funding, allowing clerks to retain all excess Article V revenue rather than returning half to the state and clarifying foreclosure sale procedures. In addition, the committee passed CS/CS/SB 1602 and CS/CS/SB 1604 to create and fund a pilot housing program for veterans through the Florida Housing Finance Corporation, and CS/SB 1110 to expand Medicaid and private insurance coverage for medically necessary orthotics and prosthetics, including testimony from affected families and advocates. The committee also adopted an amendment and then favorably reported CS/CS/SB 1012 on inmate services, removing the bill’s medical-services compensation provisions while retaining changes to the inmate welfare trust fund and related facility uses. It also adopted a delete-all amendment and then favorably reported CS/CS/CS/SB 1614, which was narrowed to remove a provision allowing local governments to use excess fees to construct new buildings. The committee spent substantial time on CS/SB 17, a Medicaid oversight and transparency bill. The sponsor said the measure would create a joint legislative Medicaid oversight committee, authorize the Legislature to retain its own actuary, modernize Medicaid statutes, strengthen managed-care performance standards, and increase accountability for pharmacy benefit managers and related entities. After amendment, the committee adopted changes removing several PBM-related provisions while retaining the broader oversight framework. Testimony from supporters emphasized transparency, fraud prevention, and cost control, while a PBM trade association asked to continue working on affiliate-manufacturer, network, and payment issues. The bill was reported favorably. The most extensive discussion centered on CS/SB 1758, which proposes major changes to Medicaid and SNAP. The sponsor described five reforms: stronger fraud and overpayment recovery authority, a Medicaid work requirement for certain able-bodied adults, expanded behavioral-health services through Medicaid waivers, pharmacy-program changes to obtain rebates and reduce institutional costs, and SNAP/EBT reforms including photo IDs and work requirements. The committee adopted two amendments: one adding a transitional “glide path” for people who gain employment but risk losing Medicaid, and another exempting hospice patients with six months or less to live. Supporters argued the bill would reduce fraud, improve accountability, and encourage work, while opponents warned it would increase administrative burdens, push eligible people off coverage, and conflict with federal law or guidance. The bill remained under debate with extensive public testimony from advocates, providers, and affected families, and the transcript ends before final disposition on the measure.

Transcript Highlights:

• Holbold mentioned, figure out who would be eligible to vote in this election.
• Major, you did want to add something. You asked to speak.” “Yes, sir. Thank you.
• Chad Major, Representative Professional Firefighters.” “Yes, sir. Thank you.
• Chad Major, Representative Professional Firefighters.
• that are going to vote, and people get no mail ballots that should be voting that won't be able to vote

Bills: HB41

Keywords: Firefighters' Retirement System, FRS, retirement board, board of trustees, firefighter pension, public pension, retirement system governance, active members, service credit, Professional Fire Fighters Association, PFFA, Louisiana Fire Chiefs Association, fire chiefs, retirees, beneficiaries, DROP, Deferred Retirement Option Plan, board elections, vacancies, Louisiana retirement law