Video & Transcript : 'restrictions' :

Page 106 of 500
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Civil Rights & Judiciary Jan 27th, 2026 at 10:30 am

Civil Rights & Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • In a limited equity cooperative, the resale price of those corporate shares is limited, restricted, to
  • And the goal of those restrictions is typically to maintain long-term affordability.
  • Next, the bill addresses administration of involuntary medication under a less restrictive alternative
  • Where a person is subject to a less restrictive alternative treatment order, a treatment provider may
  • The least restrictive administration piece. It is the least restrictive alternative.
WA
Transcript Highlights:
  • landscape, we have seen a heightened hostility to medication abortion, from Senate hearings on restricting
  • From Senate hearings on restricting its prescription via telehealth to lawsuits aimed at cutting access
  • Washington college students coming from home states with restrictive policies deserve the chance to obtain
  • increased access points that lessen the burden on Washington State clinics, from Senate hearings on restricting
  • Washington College students coming from home states with restrictive policies deserve the chance to obtain
Summary: The Workforce Development Committee heard public testimony on several higher education bills. Senate Bill 5954 would expand veteran survivor tuition waiver eligibility to better align state law with federal DEA benefits, allowing eligible children and surviving spouses/domestic partners to use the waiver outside current age and time limits. The sponsor and veteran advocates said the change would help families access earned benefits; no opposition was heard, and the public hearing was closed. The committee then heard Senate Bill 5826, which would require public postsecondary institutions to provide access to medication abortion through student health centers or referrals and web-based information by the 2027-28 academic year. Supporters, including students and reproductive health advocates, said the bill would reduce barriers, travel burdens, and stigma and help students stay enrolled. Opponents, including clergy, Catholic Conference representatives, and other individuals, argued the bill promoted abortion, raised safety and moral concerns, and was outside the mission of colleges. The public hearing was closed after extensive testimony. Senate Bill 5828 would restore and adjust Washington College Grant and College Bound Scholarship awards for students attending private not-for-profit four-year institutions, using the average award at public institutions rather than the reduced formula adopted last session. The sponsor and many students, private college leaders, and business and workforce groups supported the bill as a matter of fairness, access, and student choice, while public university faculty and representatives opposed it, saying state aid should prioritize public institutions and that the bill would deepen funding inequities. The committee also heard Senate Bill 5909, which would require public baccalaureate institutions to review and potentially discontinue low-enrollment degree programs; supporters framed it as a transparency and efficiency measure, while faculty and student representatives opposed it as too blunt and potentially harmful to smaller, specialized, or equity-focused programs. No votes were taken on any of the bills during the hearing.
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

October 8, 2025 - 01:00 PM

Transcript Highlights:
  • So they are highly restrictive. Thank you.
  • the approach to mobility fees still lies on a pre-identified list of improvements that are not restricted
  • would also argue that they are not necessarily attractive to local governments because they're a restricted
  • the approach to mobility fees still lies on a pre-identified list of improvements that are not restricted
  • . ...of improvements that are not restricted to road capacity.
Summary: The Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee met for its first meeting of the 2026 session and took up impact fees, with an opening overview from Eric Poole of the Florida Association of Counties. Poole explained that impact fees are one-time charges on new development used only for new infrastructure capacity, not existing deficiencies or maintenance, and must satisfy the dual rational nexus test. He traced their history in Florida and described how comprehensive plans, concurrency, and later mobility fees relate to local infrastructure funding. He argued that impact fees are restricted, tied to capital improvements, and are one tool for paying for growth. Panelists representing counties, cities, builders, and community developers largely agreed that growth creates real infrastructure costs but differed on how those costs should be allocated. County and city representatives said impact fees are a necessary, targeted way to fund roads, water, sewer, fire, schools, and parks without spreading costs across all taxpayers. They pointed to long periods without fee updates, rising construction costs, and examples of large increases justified by studies. Builder and developer representatives argued that fees are often unpredictable, can be doubled or tripled, and contribute to housing affordability problems; they also said the system can be inconsistent across jurisdictions and may encourage sprawl. Several witnesses emphasized that fees must be transparent, proportional, and tied to actual benefits, and some suggested a statewide framework or mobility-fee model with more consistency and peer review. Members asked about how long local governments can hold fee revenue, whether fees can generate profit, what they can be spent on, and whether they can pay for police stations, fire stations, or other public safety facilities. Witnesses said the funds must be used for capital projects and cannot be used for salaries or unrelated purchases, and that refunds may be required if money is not spent within the local ordinance’s timeframe. The discussion also covered examples of local fee increases, the use of impact fees versus direct construction or “pipelining” of infrastructure, and concerns about level-of-service changes and extraordinary-circumstance increases. No votes were taken; the meeting ended after the panel discussion and member questions, with the chair noting the conversation would continue.
NM

New Mexico 2025 Regular Session

IC - New Mexico Finance Authority Oversight Aug 11th, 2025

New Mexico Finance Authority Oversight Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • There are many restrictions on issuing bonds to fund operations and maintenance.
  • Our Constitution also contains many restrictions on the issuance of debt.
  • It restricts the ability of the state to either lend its credit or give aid to private industry.
  • 2007, 2008, 2009, 2011, and 2012. 2006, 2010, and 2022, all to try to get around some of these restrictions
  • It's been amended many times to try to make it less restrictive over the years.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Land & Resource Management Apr 24th, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • Passage of 3892 is vital to removing restrictive and unnecessary governmental regulations and ensuring
  • affordability and remove legacy regulations at the local level that we believe have artificially restricted
  • Specifically, House Bill 3892, uh, restrictions on local governments from adopting minimum lot sizes,
  • years with hopes of one day having the reward of a reasonable payday with reasonable development restrictions
  • that flexibility matters, especially in our urban areas where land is limited and zoning is overly restrictive
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Public Safety Committee Apr 1st, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • utilizing public transportation and that is their main means of getting from point A to point B, restricting
  • Restricting that can obviously have lots of downstream consequences, and so would like to look further
  • And it is unfortunate that restricting transportation to those that do, the seven TROs that you say you
  • 2022 adds further evidence in support of this measure, emphasizing the states must not unreasonably restrict
  • “Oftentimes, these overburdensome restrictions can disproportionately impact vulnerable populations by
Summary: The Assembly Public Safety Committee met to consider several bills, with six measures approved on consent, including bills on background checks, female offender prison facilities, a juvenile justice hunger survey, protective orders and firearms, a youth offender camp pilot, and peace officer behavioral health training. AB 710 and AB 848 were pulled by the authors. The committee also took up AB 458, AB 394, AB 1094, AB 1092, and AB 1036, with extensive testimony on each. AB 458, by Assembly Member Stephanie, would require state agencies purchasing firearms, ammunition, or accessories to vet vendors for compliance with firearms laws and procurement standards. Supporters, including Brady and the California Police Chiefs Association, said taxpayer funds should not go to dealers with serious violations; opponents argued the bill added burdens and vague standards. The committee approved the bill as amended and sent it to Appropriations. AB 394, by Assembly Member Wilson, would expand protections for transit workers and riders by broadening enhanced battery penalties, clarifying who may seek temporary restraining orders in the transit context, and making those orders system-wide. Transit agencies, labor groups, and law enforcement supported the bill, while public defender and civil liberties groups raised concerns about vagueness, duration, and impacts on access to transit. The committee passed AB 394 to Judiciary as amended. AB 1094, by Assembly Member Baines, would raise the minimum parole eligibility term for child torture convictions involving a child under 14 in the perpetrator’s care or custody from seven years to 20 years. Prosecutors, sheriffs, and police groups supported the bill, citing the severity of the abuse and the need to protect child victims; opponents argued the parole system already screens for risk and that harsher sentences do not improve public safety. The committee approved the bill as amended to Appropriations. AB 1092, by Assembly Member Castillo, would extend concealed carry weapon license renewals from two years to four years; supporters said it would reduce costs and administrative burdens, while the chair and others opposed it as unnecessary. The committee ultimately voted the bill down. AB 1036, by Assembly Member Schultz, would expand post-conviction discovery access for people convicted of felonies with sentences of one year or more, including Brady materials and jury selection notes. Innocence organizations and defense groups supported it, while district attorneys opposed the broader discovery obligations; the committee passed it to Appropriations as amended.
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

Education Pre-K - 12 Mar 25th, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill blatantly restricts the freedom of young people to access birth control and testing for us
  • It restricts access to essential reproductive health care and family planning every day.
  • Whether is it too financial struggles, lack of shelter and transportation or restrictive state laws SB
  • Shame, judgment or interference when the policies that expand our care and not restricted urge everyone
  • I oppose this bill which attempts to restrict the freedom of young people to access birth control family
Keywords: 999, senate, all
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs Mar 12th, 2025

Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • My driver's license still shows me with the restriction on there.
  • This bill would simply allow us to help our patients remove that vision correction restriction. from
  • So right now if you if you go and pass your vision test at the DMV, all good, no restrictions.
  • Please remove the restriction.
  • process if you're you're not coming from the DMV you're at my office you don't have a restriction it
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Committee on Housing (04/15/2025)

Housing

Transcript Highlights:
  • Don't put any more restrictions on us.
  • Don't put any more restrictions on us.
  • </c> that those communities uh restrictions that those communities uh restrictions have<01:33:59.520>
  • He said he looked at how towns responded to neighboring town zoning restrictions.
  • </c> to neighboring town zoning restrictions. to neighboring town zoning restrictions.
Keywords: 1189, house, all
MD

Maryland 2026 Regular Session

House Floor Session, 3/31/2026 #1

Maryland House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Another case he brought dealt with restrictive covenants, which said that you couldn't sell a home to
  • Another case he brought dealt with restrictive covenants, which said that you couldn't sell a home to
  • Another case he brought dealt with restrictive covenants, which said that you couldn't sell a home to
  • In the Department of Commerce, Amendment 21 restricts funds for a specified project.
  • </c> restricts funds for a specified project. restricts funds for a specified project.
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Appropriations Feb 5th, 2026

Transcript Highlights:
  • First, there are four restrictions that are placed on the sale of retail products in First, there are
  • four restrictions that are placed on the sale of retail products in a grocery.
  • The first restriction requires the business to clearly post the price of goods.
  • The third restriction prohibits a business from using surge pricing to modify the price of goods.
  • The final restriction prohibits a business from using an electronic shelf label system in stores that
Summary: The committee heard public hearings on several bills. HB 2675 would eliminate a number of state accounts and transfer remaining balances from two accounts to the general fund, while also changing how revenues in the Salary Insurance Contribution Increase Revolving Account are deposited; OFM testified in support and there was no public opposition. SHB 1903 would create a statewide low-income energy assistance program through the Department of Commerce, funded by the general fund and Climate Commitment Act revenues; supporters said it would address Washington’s underfunded and uneven energy assistance system, while utilities and rural co-ops raised concerns about cost, reporting burdens, utility authority, and implementation details. SHB 2384 would require actuarial reviews for certain continuing care retirement communities with prepaid life care contracts; residents and consumer advocates supported the added transparency, while providers opposed the added review costs and said they already pay for actuarial work. SHB 1982 would expand the ability of tribal members to vacate convictions tied to treaty rights, add OPD representation and a tribal liaison position, and then an amendment was described that would remove the liaison position and eliminate the fiscal impact; the sponsor and OPD supported the bill, and testimony emphasized correcting past treaty-rights convictions. The committee also heard SHB 2389, a broad juvenile justice bill that would expand suspended disposition options, create midpoint review hearings, reduce some robbery ranges, and address juvenile rehabilitation capacity and transfers. Supporters argued it would reduce racial disparities, favor community-based rehabilitation when safe, and improve outcomes, while prosecutors, sheriffs, counties, judges, cities, victim advocates, and some tribal law enforcement warned it would weaken accountability for serious violent offenses, increase court and local government burdens, and shift costs without funding. Several witnesses and the bill sponsor discussed proposed amendments, including removing presumptions and the mid-sentence review. The committee then heard SHB 2439, which would raise tobacco and vapor product license fees, create a responsible vendor program, add manufacturer certification and enforcement provisions, restrict certain products and sales practices, and redirect tobacco tax revenue to public health, cancer research, and youth prevention accounts; public health and prevention groups supported it, while retailers and industry representatives opposed the fee increases and some of the new restrictions. Finally, HB 2681 would sharply increase cannabis license fees and index them to inflation; OFM supported the change as aligning fees with program costs, while cannabis businesses and associations opposed or sought changes to the fee structure and CPI indexing. The committee also heard a briefing on SHB 2215, which would require the Caseload Forecast Council to forecast SNAP and state food assistance caseloads in light of upcoming federal cost-sharing changes; no questions were raised at the briefing.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Public Safety Committee May 6th, 2026

Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • suppress our votes, including the Trump regime's threats to send immigration enforcement to the polls, restrictive
  • voter... ...regime's threats to send immigration enforcement to the polls, restrictive voter ID initiative
  • This bill imposes new restrictions and enhances existing provisions with the specter of civil remedies
Keywords: 988, house, all
NY

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Standing Committee on Codes - 03/24/2026

Codes

Transcript Highlights:
  • You said about removing some restrictions on the bill.
  • Senator Gallivan, you said that this bill would remove some restrictions on showing tattoos and allow
  • Is there a section of the bill that talks about restrictions on the type of tattoos that can be visible
Keywords: 993, senate, all
Summary: The Senate Standing Committee on Codes met in a different room due to scheduling conflicts and considered a series of bills, mostly criminal procedure, penal law, civil rights, and executive law measures. Several bills had previously passed the Senate unanimously and were quickly moved through committee, including measures sponsored by Senators Harkham, Scootis, Bernardis, Scarsella Spanton, Conrad, Ryan, Jimenez, and others. The committee also considered Senate Print 1004A by Senator Brisport, which would amend the Criminal Procedure Law and Mental Hygiene Law to address prolonged detention of incapacitated individuals; Senator Palumbo supported the bill’s intent but objected to the mechanism, and the bill was reported to finance with Palumbo in the negative and Gallivan without recommendation. Senator Bailey’s Senate Print 4525, focused on language access in criminal procedure, drew supportive comments about ensuring non-English speakers are not denied justice, but it was reported with Senator Kavanagh without recommendation and Senators Murray and Palumbo in the negative. The committee also advanced Senate Print 5110A by Senator Scarcella Spanton, which would increase protections for HPD inspectors by making assaults on them a low-level felony; members expressed concern about increasing penalties but agreed the bill had merit, and it was reported with Kavanagh without recommendation and Brisport and Sepúlveda in the negative. The most extended discussion centered on Senate Print 3021C by Senator Hinchy, which would require a uniform tattoo policy for state and local law enforcement. Members debated First Amendment concerns, subjectivity in determining what is “offensive,” and whether the bill should set clearer guardrails or simply require agencies to adopt a policy. Supporters said the bill aimed to create statewide consistency and reflect changing norms around tattoos, while critics worried about subjective enforcement and potential constitutional issues. The bill was moved by Senator Myrie and reported, with Senators Sepúlveda and Brisport without recommendation. The meeting then adjourned after the chair thanked members for the discussion.
FL

Florida 2026 4th Special Session

February 16, 2026 - 11:30 AM

Transcript Highlights:
  • On one hand, your PCB puts additional restrictions and requirements on these funds, but I question the
  • I am glad to see us doing something and putting restrictions there, but I don't like the idea of them
  • having this pot of money at all without restriction.
Summary: The Transportation Economic Budget Subcommittee met with a quorum and heard four measures. First, the committee considered PCS for HB 1177, which originally addressed ad valorem tax exemptions for defense and aerospace operations and contract procedures for Space Florida. An amendment removed the tax exemption portion for later consideration in the tax package, and the bill then passed favorably after brief discussion about Florida’s competitiveness in the space industry. The committee next took up a conforming budget bill on documentary stamp taxes, which redirects a portion of doc stamp revenue from general revenue to the State Transportation Trust Fund. The sponsor said the change restores a $60 million transportation funding stream with a corresponding general revenue reduction, while maintaining a net zero fiscal impact overall. Members asked about why the funding was being restored and how the money would be used, and the bill passed favorably. Members then heard PCB 26-02, which re-creates the Emergency Preparedness Response Fund and adds restrictions and oversight. The proposal limits the fund to state appropriations for natural emergencies, requires legislative consultation for extended emergencies, keeps revenue in the fund, sends federal reimbursements to general revenue, adds quarterly reporting and inventory/accounting requirements, and sunsets the fund in 2030 unless reenacted. Testimony and debate focused on accountability, disaster response readiness, and concerns about prior uses of the fund; the PCB passed favorably. Finally, the committee considered HB 953, which strengthens oversight of commercial driving schools by authorizing county tax collectors to enforce related statutes and inspections. The sponsor said the bill responds to fraud and misrepresentation in the industry and would help protect driver licensing integrity, especially in South Florida. After supportive testimony from the Miami-Dade Tax Collector’s Office and a lobbyist, the bill passed favorably. The meeting then adjourned.
WA
Transcript Highlights:
  • the conditions that the underlying bill authorizes to require that those conditions are the least restrictive
  • Indian child welfare laws took precedence in looking at all of these situations, that the least restrictive
  • Indian child welfare laws took precedence in looking at all of these situations, that the least restrictive
Summary: The House Early Learning & Human Services Committee met in executive session on three bills. House Bill 2200, concerning JLARC review of safety and stability outcomes for DSHS developmental disabilities clients and a DSHS public reporting requirement, was amended with a technical correction (House Amendment 799) and then reported out with a do pass recommendation. Supporters said the substitute shifts from a dashboard to an annual downloadable report, delays the timeline, and asks JLARC to recommend a methodology for future data collection; one member raised concerns about possible stigma and impacts on providers, but the bill passed 9-2. House Bill 2468, which updates DSHS statutory references to reflect agency restructuring and makes related technical changes, was advanced without amendment after the substitute reinstated the Dementia Action Collaborative expiration date and the requirement for two permanent employees to review the no-paid-services caseload. Members described it as a non-substantive cleanup bill to streamline and harmonize agency law. It was reported out unanimously, 11-0. House Bill 2660, authorizing courts to order conditions to keep a child under age five safe in the home after a shelter care hearing, had several proposed amendments withdrawn before action. The remaining amendment, Wickham 848, was adopted; it adds that the conditions must be the least restrictive necessary, reviewed every 30 days, and consistent with state and federal Indian Child Welfare Act requirements. The substitute bill then passed 9-2, with supporters saying it responds to recent critical incidents and opponents noting concerns but acknowledging shared commitment to child safety. The committee then adjourned and noted there would be no meeting the following day.
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Children, Families, and Elder Affairs Feb 3rd, 2026

Children, Families, and Elder Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Under current law, individuals convicted of certain drug offenses are restricted from accessing Supplemental
  • However, federal law expressly allows states to opt out or modify this restriction.
  • However, federal law expressly allows states to opt out or modify this restriction.
Keywords: 999, senate, all
Summary: The Committee on Children, Families, and Elder Affairs heard several child welfare and early childhood bills and reported each favorably. SB 1690 on early childhood education was amended with a delete-all amendment that would require public posting of child care inspection and safety data, change certain child care disclosure and insurance rules, and create the Florida Endowment for Early Learning; the committee adopted the amendment and then reported the bill favorably. SB 1022 would add two new Florida Children’s Initiatives programs in Bay County and Pompano in Broward County, and it was also reported favorably. The committee then took up SB 996 on dependent children. Senator Rodriguez explained that the bill is intended to center lived experience in foster care policy and promote normalcy, including financial literacy and allowance-related supports. Multiple members of Florida Youth SHINE testified in strong support, describing the importance of youth voice, consistent allowances, and opportunities to build budgeting skills and confidence. Senator Sharief also voiced support, and the bill was reported favorably. Finally, the committee considered a bill on temporary cash assistance eligibility, presented with an amendment that narrowed a SNAP eligibility carve-out to people who were victims of human trafficking at the time of a drug conviction. The sponsor said the change recognizes coercion faced by trafficking victims and avoids a lifetime penalty tied to exploitation. After the amendment was adopted and several supporters waived in, the committee reported CS for SB 1462 favorably. The meeting then adjourned without further business.
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Housing Jan 29th, 2026 at 08:00 am

Housing

Transcript Highlights:
  • Representative Lowe, modifies the definition of senior independent housing to exclude senior age-restricted
  • housing communities or developments where the primary purpose is age-restricted residency without the
  • It also excludes senior age-restricted manufactured mobile home communities that do not provide meals
Bills: HB1542, HB2452, HB2664
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate County and Municipal Government Committee Apr 15th, 2025

County and Municipal Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • regulation, or policy that prohibits or has the effect policy that prohibits or has the effect of restricting
  • If you create restrictions that prohibit distribution and storage in certain areas, then you're restricting
Bills: HB407, SB306, SB320, SB321
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

Ethics and Elections Mar 17th, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • REPRESENTATIVES IS A SACRED RIGHT AND ANY TIME WE ARE TAKING SOMETHING AWAY FROM THE PEOPLE THAT IS A RESTRICTION
  • WE ARE RESTRICTING THEM INSTEAD OF GIVING THEM MORE FREEDOM TO CHOOSE.
  • THIS IS DEFINITELY A RESTRICTION ON THEIR FREEDOMS.
Keywords: 999, senate, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee 3/17/26

Public Safety Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c><00:04:49.960><c> firearm</c><00:04:50.440><c> access</c> issued orders restricting firearm access
  • issued orders restricting firearm access for<00:04:51.240><c> more</c><00:04:51.400><c> than</c><00:
  • restrict the person's constitutional<00:19:15.240><c> right.
  • Uh and as a former restriction.
  • I think the main other consideration I would note is the court's restrictions on its own data.