Transcript Highlights:

• So, whatever is transferred to payments.
• <00:27:06.159> So for provider payments legal service.
• So for provider payments legal service.
• Um, it's $10,000 a year to the payments.
• So, it's not an insignificant payments.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee worked through several HB 2 budget amendments, focusing first on energy-related transfers and then on judicial funding. For the energy item, members discussed moving remaining money from the renewable energy fund into the general fund for the biennium, with later-year amounts going to the general fund rather than ratepayers. They noted the proposal was based on prior House Bill 111 language, that the exact amount was still being worked out with the Department of Energy, and that some language about “incentive payments” was being removed or clarified. Amendment 1211H was moved and adopted on a 5-4 vote. The committee then considered amendment 1040 on the governor’s scholarship fund, which would eliminate the program and sweep uncommitted funds. Members supporting the program argued it helps New Hampshire students afford in-state college and should be reworked rather than repealed; opponents said the remaining balance was limited and the program should be ended. Amendment 1040 was defeated 4-5. The committee then turned to a judicial council request tied to a Franklin Pierce criminal justice clinic that had previously used ARPA funds. Supporters said the clinic cleared 323 cases in nine months, provided training for future attorneys, and could reduce more expensive assigned-counsel costs by helping the public defender system handle cases more efficiently. The amendment would add $100,000 to the judicial council line for that purpose. There was some confusion over the line item and whether the request should be attributed to the judicial branch or judicial council, which was corrected during discussion. Members also discussed a larger issue: the judicial council’s budget request appeared lower than intended because of a possible clerical error in how prior-year funding was calculated, especially after the last budget combined HB 1 and HB 2 funding. The committee compared the public defender line and assigned counsel line, noting that if public defender funding is cut, more cases would shift to assigned counsel, which is more expensive. No final vote on the judicial council amendment is shown in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• And then third, you all are very aware of the impact—the potential impact—of SNAP payment error rates
• That has the potential, if we don't bring that payment error rate down, to cost New Mexico up to $156
• It is probably going to outpace mortgage payments soon.
• We really want to be able to hone in and say, like, this office has payment error rates.
• Reduce payment errors, strengthen compliance, and mitigate future liability.

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• . for the water sewer services to bill introduces limits on payment fees it was specific limit municipal
• utility provides water or water services from charging a late payment fee.
• The late payment period, penalty period, must end on the date the customer pays all past dues to the
• Would if you miss that payment would be 10% of that would be $11. All right thank you.
• These additional structures can effectuate a 10 to 15% lower annual debt service payment.

Bills: HB1520, HB1525, HB1530, HB1535, HB2068, HB2091, HB2347, HB2372, HB2805, HB2815, HB2867, HB3154, HB3482, HB3483, HB3663, HB3781, HB3901, HB3915, HB4135, HB4153, HB4158, HB4329, HB4331

Keywords: Angelina and Neches River Authority, river authority, Sunset Advisory Commission, Texas Sunset Act, Special District Local Laws Code, local government, natural resources, board of directors, director training, board governance, public testimony, open meetings, public information, conflict of interest, ethics, complaint system, general manager, board president, staggered terms, removal of director

Transcript Highlights:

• And adequacy payments are next year.
• <02:08:33.920> is knows what their adequacy payment is knows what their adequacy payment is
• Um, you could send those bills directly to the state for payment, have a payment center at the Department
• payment.
• special education payments special education payments reimbursements.<02:29:25.120> House

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So when you say the one-time payment, what would the one-time payment be?
• The next payment would be your future cost, which is included when you have 10 years of payments.
• , so it doesn't adjust how much payments are made, where the payments are made from.
• , so it doesn't adjust how much payments are made or where the payments are made from.
• Okay, but what about the payment to the owner of Granite Place? The lease payments, you mean?

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Summary: The committee met to continue work on House Bill 2, with the chair saying the goal was to finish the bill as given by the governor, though additional amendments were expected. Members first discussed the bail section and agreed to hold it for later because a separate House bail bill was expected on Thursday and could have significant county cost impacts. They also generally accepted the proposed reorganization of positions between Fish and Game, DNCR, and the Department of Environmental Services, but noted the need to review effective dates and funding details, including a possible double appropriation of $275,000 for a scientist position already funded in HB 1. A substantial portion of the meeting focused on environmental review and native plant-related sections moving functions from DNCR to DES. Members discussed changing the rulemaking timeline from 180 days to 90 days, and clarifying that “begin” means the public hearing stage. They also reviewed how fee revenue would shift between agencies in HB 1 so the budget impact would be net zero. The committee indicated it would prepare amendments reflecting these changes and revisit them at a later vote. The longest discussion concerned the boathouse provisions. Members debated whether the new definitions and construction standards were appropriate in a budget bill, with one member arguing they should be in a separate bill, while others said the provisions were urgent because of a lawsuit and the lack of clear guardrails. Concerns included the February 20, 2025 effective date, which some thought might be retroactive, the detailed limits on what may be stored in a boathouse, and a fee increase that some felt could discourage homeowners from seeking permits. The committee also questioned whether the fee structure should be tiered for smaller projects and whether permit-by-notification projects should be exempted. No final votes were taken on these sections during the discussion; instead, members agreed to seek legal and policy answers and to return with amendments and public hearing input before voting.

Transcript Highlights:

• And then, not mentioned in the letter, but we do have this existing long-term payment performance program
• She noted that the long-term payment performance program is programmed out to 2031 and asked whether
• You got to then<00:46:10.400> generate<00:46:10.640> the<00:46:10.760> payment,<
• , you travel to then generate the payment, you travel to the<00:46:12.400> deputy<00:46:12.800
• Senate File 285 cost participation utility payment, is that right?

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• However, we understand that this bill is to aid payments to non-participating providers. Right?
• <00:48:54.720> under<00:48:54.960> the states that um payment under the states that
• um payment under the subsection<00:48:56.240> uh<00:48:56.559> needs<00:48:56.800>
• to aid payments to non-participating providers.<00:49:29.760> Right?
• if a hospital sues a patient for payment if a hospital sues a patient for payment or<01:41:12.560

Bills: HB1853, HB1591, HB1961, HB1854, HB1965, HB1962, HB1959, HB2505, HB2576, HB1801, HB1804, HB1864, HB2319, HB2314, HB2115

Keywords: HB1853, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, cognitive impairment, memory care, memory clinic, Hanai Memory Network, Executive Office on Aging, aging services, kupuna, caregiver support, long-term care, elder care, geriatrics, public health, dementia screening, care coordination, referral network, neighbor islands, rural health

Summary: The committee heard testimony on SB 2047, relating to pharmacy benefit managers. The Insurance Division said the bill would require new enforcement resources and estimated an appropriation of about $1.5 million and five positions. Kaiser Permanente asked for an amendment to exclude HMOs from the definition of third-party PBMs, saying the bill should not interfere with integrated care models. PCMA and the Hawaii Pharmacist Association supported narrowing amendments, with pharmacists objecting to section 3 and warning the bill as amended could create major operational burdens and a significant general fund cost. No vote was taken in the portion provided, and the chair moved on to the next measure after questions. The committee then took up SB 2080, which would allow Hawaii to join the psychology interjurisdictional compact. Supporters, including DCR, the Hawaii Association of Health Plans, the Hawaii State Association of Counties, the Grassroot Institute, and others, said the compact would expand access to psychology services, especially for people in rural areas or those needing continuity of care while traveling. Opponents, including the Board of Psychology and a Shamanad University psychology professor, raised concerns about client safety, crisis-response procedures, enforcement costs, FBI background checks, and possible loss of state control over training and specialization standards. The board said Hawaii’s current 1,900-hour internship/postdoc requirement is higher than the compact’s standard and that the state is still implementing a separate provisional licensing law that may address some access issues. The discussion focused on whether the compact would meaningfully reduce shortages and whether Hawaii should instead pursue changes within its existing licensing system. Finally, the committee heard SB 2277 on hospital price transparency. The Office of Consumer Protection initially noted the bill could require significant staffing, but later testimony from SHIP suggested the measure could be handled more simply by working with the Healthcare Association of Hawaii and publicly posting violations. The Healthcare Association of Hawaii opposed the bill, arguing hospitals already must comply with federal CMS transparency rules and that adding state requirements would increase costs and legal exposure, especially if violations were treated as unfair or deceptive trade practices. Steve Fenberg testified in support, saying the bill would simply codify existing federal requirements in state law and that he was open to amendments removing state enforcement and the unfair trade practice language. No final action was taken in the excerpt provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• And they've actively refused and gone out of their way to block direct provider payment.
• for non-par um substance use payments for non-par um substance use disorder<00:23:01.360> facilities
• and in supporting our members payments and in supporting our members to<00:23:28.200> not<00:
• Why wouldn't HMSA honor an agreement by its member to assign its benefits, or assign the payment to a
• Why wouldn't HMSA honor an agreement by its member to assign its benefits, or assign the payment to a

Bills: SB2433, SB2047, SB2425, SB3045, SB2761, SB3001, SB2852, SB2471

Keywords: condominium governance, education trust fund, unit owners, real estate, dispute resolution, financial obligations, community representation, pharmacy benefit managers, maximum allowable cost, transparency, drug pricing, insurance commissioner, contracting pharmacies, healthcare, substance use disorder, SUD, addiction treatment, behavioral health, mental health, rehabilitation

Summary: The committee heard testimony on SB 2433 SD1 relating to condominiums, which would direct the condominium education trust fund toward educational resources for unit owners and require the Real Estate Commission to ensure owners’ interests are represented in funded activities and related rulemaking. Supporters, including the Hawaii Real Estate Commission and a condominium owner advocate, said owners need a seat at the table in condo governance and education efforts. Committee discussion focused on whether the bill was necessary, with the Real Estate Commission indicating it could already use the trust fund for owner education and that owners are already considered stakeholders, though not through a specific commission seat. No vote was taken during the excerpted discussion. The committee then took up SB 2047 SD2 HD1 on pharmacy benefit managers, which would set requirements for maximum allowable cost reimbursement, allow reverse-and-rebill claims after successful appeals, and authorize fines for violations. The Insurance Division offered comments, the Hawaii Pharmacists Association supported the measure with amendments and suggested future PBM reform funding, and Kaiser Permanente requested a technical amendment. A committee question raised whether the staffing and resource request for implementation was too large for a bill focused only on MAC pricing, and the witness said he would provide more data to the next committee. No final action was shown. Next was SB 2425 SD2 HD1 on health insurance and substance use disorder treatment, requiring insurers to honor written assignments of benefits to SUD providers and prohibiting anti-assignment clauses. Supporters described patients being unable to access treatment because of high out-of-pocket costs and said direct payment would reduce harm for people in recovery. HMSA opposed the bill but said it would begin direct payments to non-participating SUD facilities effective March 27, while continuing to object to the assignment-of-benefits portion because of fraud and balance-billing concerns; the Hawaii Association of Health Plans also opposed. Members questioned HMSA about reimbursement mechanics and why the bill was needed if coverage policies were already changing. Finally, the committee heard SB 3045 SD1 HD1, which would require coverage of continuous glucose monitors and related supplies, including for Medicaid managed care, under certain conditions. DHS and the Insurance Division offered comments, while SHPDA, Hilo Benioff Medical Center Foundation, and others supported the bill, citing inconsistent access and a case in which a woman allegedly died after being denied a CGM. HMSA said it already covers medically necessary CGMs and had updated its policy in 2025 for type 1 and insulin-dependent patients, but it raised concerns about expanding mandated coverage to type 2 and gestational diabetes and about supply impacts. The committee also discussed whether the bill duplicated existing coverage standards and why it had been introduced repeatedly. No votes or final dispositions were included in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• The letter of protection guarantees payment, does it not?
• When you say it doesn't guarantee a payment.
• But if the case falls through or doesn't settle, then there's no guarantee of payment for that.
• So a lot of the letter protections are not a guarantee. payment. Can you accept those? Yes.
• Why do you accept it if it's not a guaranteed payment?

Bills: HB 1181, HB3704, HB1363, HB1610, HB1615, HB1620, HB3223, HB1317, HB2884, HB2176, HB4027, HB1664, HB933, HB2613, HB3353, HB2086, HB4101, HB3441, HB4145, HB3455

Keywords: judiciary, judges, justices, retired, legal assignments, judicial conduct, notary public, criminal offense, education requirements, official documents, record retention, implicit bias, bias training, judicial training, judge education, court personnel, continuing legal education, CLE, state bar, Texas Court of Criminal Appeals

Transcript Highlights:

• We do work with them to make a payment arrangement, whether we are deducting from what their CCAP payment
• is to them to recoup some of those funds or if they're going to set up a long-term payment.
• <00:26:05.520> arrangement with them to make a payment arrangement with them to make a payment
• set up a long-term payment set up a long-term payment so<00:26:18.480> okay<00:26:18.720>
• <00:31:55.159> is wants to lend me the down payment is wants to lend me the down payment is

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The committee met with a quorum, approved the minutes, and then reviewed a long agenda of administrative regulations, most of which were advanced with staff-suggested amendments and no objection. Early items included the Kentucky Public Pension Authority’s 105 KAR 1:451, which updates reporting language and adds the contractor wizard for certain employers, and a large package of Board of Veterinary Examiners regulations that revise fees, facility and AHP registration requirements, continuing education, liability, and practice rules. The Board of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology’s compact-related regulation and the Board of Licensed Professional Counselors’ complaint and compact rules were also reviewed and approved with amendments, along with fish and wildlife rules affecting elk hunting, youth deer season length, bear-dog approvals, and foxhound enclosure permits. The committee also approved transportation, education, workplace standards, horse racing, and several health and human services regulations, including Medicaid waiver reimbursement updates and a child care regulation that sends certain large claims to the Office of Inspector General for review. Several agencies briefly explained their regulations when members asked questions. Fish and Wildlife said the elk population is strong and the baiting change is intended to support harvest monitoring and fair chase, while the longer youth deer season was meant to give young hunters more opportunity. The Department of Community-Based Services said the $10,000 and $5,000 claim thresholds were meant to clarify rare cases involving possible fraud or unresolved recoupment issues. The Department of Financial Institutions’ 808 KAR 5:305 drew the most discussion: it would allow certain state-chartered credit unions with a low-income designation to participate in federal programs, including limited non-member deposits and supplemental capital, but the regulation was deferred again amid continued discussions. The Kentucky Bankers Association testified against the credit union regulation, arguing that allowing non-member deposits conflicts with existing statute limiting credit union deposits to members and other credit unions, and that an administrative regulation cannot override that statutory restriction. Committee members heard the agency’s explanation that the proposal is intended to help underserved communities and that the non-member deposit authority would be limited, but no final action was taken because the item was deferred. The meeting otherwise concluded with the remaining regulations being called, discussed briefly, and approved or advanced without objection.

Transcript Highlights:

• House Bill 2825 modifies the procedures relating to the enforcement of a defendant's default on the payment
• Those who were incarcerated for non-payment of court debt and restitution, the majority of those did
• not make payments toward restitution after being arrested and incarcerated.
• And for those who did, the average payment was $25.
• So that's a negative return on investment, and individuals who are even less able to make payments than

Bills: HB2028, HB2047, HB2136, HB2244, HB2364, HB2406, HB2415, HB2557, HB2573, HB2589, HB2720, HB2749, HB2825, HB2861, HB2862, HB2870, HB2970, HB4070, HB4117, HCR2004, HCR2051

Keywords: community restitution, homelessness, indigence, court assessments, monetary obligations, forcible entry, detainer, writ of restitution, criminal trespass, judgment enforcement, civil terrorism, disorderly conduct, vandalism, political activism, public order, subversion, government security, evictions, judgment satisfaction, tenant rights

Transcript Highlights:

• Establishing a direct care payment ratio means requiring the majority of the public Medicare. dollars
• Sometimes mistakes are made. people get benefits, get payments that they're not entitled to get, sometimes
• They do result in a payment back to the state. Very few actually go all the way to a final order.
• and Access Commission. or MACPAC noted that even if a facility receives adequate overall payment from
• Most people who are participating in this program, even if they get a payment they're not entitled to

Keywords: 1185, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The explanation was that the only payments being moved are the state payments on behalf of local districts
• The response clarified that the only two payments being moved are the state payments on behalf of local
• Yeah, so again, you have state payments on behalf of local school districts.
• What Section 1, subsection 2, points to is that the on-behalf-of payments for local districts' health
• <00:08:26.800> from of 3% which is on behalf of payment from of 3% which is on behalf of payment

Keywords: Meeting Start: 00:17 Attendance Roll Call: 00:41 Approval of Minutes: 02:40 HB 694: 03:16 SB 183: 18:32 Discussion on PPOB Membership: 36:10 Adjournment: 42:35, 958, all

Summary: The committee first approved the minutes from its January 27 meeting and then took up House Bill 694, which would create a default rule for the Teachers’ Retirement System health insurance trust fund once it reaches 100% funding, currently anticipated around 2027. The bill would redirect two funding streams now going to the health trust—state payments on behalf of local districts and other employer contributions—into TRS pension benefits if the health fund reaches and maintains full funding. The sponsor said this would add about $154 million annually to TRS pensions and would only serve as a default if no other plan is adopted later. Members asked whether the bill would shift the unfunded liability to teachers or affect employee contributions. The sponsor and staff said it would not shift liability to teachers and would not change the employee contribution; only the employer-side payments would be redirected. Several members asked about the meaning of actuarial 100% funding, whether the fund could fall back below 100%, and whether employee contributions might be reduced in the future. The sponsor said the bill is based on actuarial projections, would revert the money back to the health trust if funding fell below 100%, and does not prevent future legislative or board action. Senator Higdon and others spoke in support of discussing the issue, noting the 2010 shared-responsibility changes and the need for a default approach as full funding is reached. The committee then heard Senate Bill 183, which would amend Kentucky law governing proxy advisers used by retirement systems. The sponsor said the bill would require proxy advisers, when handling shareholder-sponsored proposals, to act solely in the interest of retirement system members and beneficiaries and to provide an economic analysis when voting against a company board’s recommendation. He argued the measure is aimed at proxy advisers such as ISS and Glass Lewis, which he said often advance ESG-related proposals not tied to shareholder value. A guest from APCIA said the bill is meant to distinguish proxy advisers from investment managers and to strengthen the 2023 law by requiring a clearer economic justification for votes that depart from board recommendations. Members asked how proxy advisers differ from other financial advisers, whether Kentucky uses them, and whether the bill would prevent pension funds from investing in companies with ESG factors if those investments are profitable. The sponsor and guest said the bill would not bar such investments; it is intended to regulate proxy voting recommendations, not investment decisions. They described the bill as a proactive measure to reinforce fiduciary responsibility and limit outside proxy influence on pension voting. No final vote on either bill was taken in the portion of the meeting provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• to other ports, nor does it follow. ...it allow for effective use of contract revenues, such as payments
• The most important of which is that we want to basically monetize, my word... ...a series of payments
• So these are not tax payments, but they are payments to the port.
• We aim to take these additional revenues from these payments in lieu of taxation, monetize those for
• These PILOT payments are not from the operations of the system.

Bills: HB535, HB2120, HB2822, HB3243, HB3457, HB3544, HB4089, HB4192, HB4669, HB4868, HB4955, HB5253, HB5669, SB1371, SB1919, SB2001

Keywords: motor vehicle, pedestrian, bicycle, traffic safety, municipality, criminal offense, pedestrian safety, traffic regulations, municipal law, bicycle regulations, motor vehicle passing, traffic law, municipalities, bicycle operation, traffic laws, municipal regulations, port commission, Corpus Christi, Nueces County, San Patricio County

Transcript Highlights:

• Madam Chair and members, AB 880 ensures that nonprofit organizations receive prompt payment and fair
• Under current law, the state can delay payments without penalty to nonprofits with contracts exceeding
• AB 880 does two key things: eliminates the exemption that allows delayed payments to nonprofits under
• to cut back services, delay staff payments, and reduce program capacity.
• Timely payments from California should not be another barrier; it should be a sign of partnership.

Summary: The Governmental Organization Committee heard a series of bills on holidays, procurement, public safety, and business regulation. AB 268 would add Diwali as an official state holiday and allow schools and state workers limited flexibility to observe it; supporters described it as a recognition of California’s large South Asian and Hindu communities, and there was no opposition. AB 770 would define “customary maintenance” for outdoor advertising displays to clarify what repairs and reinforcements are allowed; the bill was presented as a safety and consistency measure for the billboard industry. AB 783 would authorize the Department of General Services to negotiate bulk pricing for construction materials to help disaster-affected communities rebuild more affordably, with supporters from the housing and building sectors and some members raising concerns about state contracting, storage, and implementation. AB 381 would update state procurement rules to better prevent human trafficking and forced labor in supply chains, aligning state policy with federal standards and drawing support from anti-trafficking advocates, labor, and local government representatives. AB 668 would extend drink-spiking prevention measures to music festivals by requiring test strips, drink lids, and reporting procedures; supporters emphasized victim safety and underreporting, while venue operators opposed the bill unless amended, citing feasibility and cost concerns. AB 880 would require prompt payment and indirect cost coverage for nonprofits contracting with the state, with broad nonprofit support and no opposition. AB 989 would make California Native American Day a paid holiday, with tribal and allied support. AB 592 would extend and expand temporary outdoor dining and alcohol service flexibilities for restaurants, with strong support from restaurant and business groups and opposition from alcohol policy advocates who preferred a narrower or permanent grandfathering approach. Most bills advanced on committee votes, generally on party-line or broad bipartisan support. AB 770 was moved to Appropriations, AB 783 was passed as amended to the Assembly Committee on Emergency Management, AB 381 was sent to Labor, AB 668 and AB 880 were sent to Appropriations, AB 989 was sent to Public Employees and Retirement, and AB 592 was sent to Health. The committee also took up a consent calendar containing several additional bills, which was approved. The hearing ended with the roll left open for additional votes and adjournment at 3:17 p.m.

Transcript Highlights:

• They would be entitled to due process, which would first require notice whether that be for non payment
• to state exactly the terms and conditions under which someone will then be asked to leave for non payment
• Here is cash for payment for one night.
• or non non payment issues because as a separate eviction proceeding is that I can give some concern
• or when the checkout time comes and goes in your demanded to make additional payment or told to leave

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• These added benefits will reduce the state defrayal payments by $33.969 million annually starting in
• 00:07:54.120> called<00:07:54.280> a<00:07:54.400> defrayal<00:07:54.919> payment
• what's called a defrayal payment what's called a defrayal payment Minnesota<00:07:56.400> has
• <00:08:30.360> the<00:08:30.440> state<00:08:30.639> defil<00:08:31.159> payments
• <00:08:31.599> by will reduce the state defil payments by will reduce the state defil payments

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Direct payments, payments to state government, and payments to local government.
• So starting kind of in the middle of the chart with payments to state government.
• So then second, I'll talk about direct payments. So that's what's on the left side of the chart.
• Direct payments are monies that go from the federal government to essentially all of the entities that
• And then finally, on the right side of the chart, we have payments to local governments.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The surviving spouse benefit payment would be exempt from state taxes as long as filers make $125,000
• As of January 31, 2023, about 127,000 military retirees in California received total monthly payments
• About 25,000 survivors in California received total monthly payments just over $39 million, or about
• The bill preserves flexibility for taxpayers who are actively complying through an installment payment
• contractors and preserve flexibility for taxpayers who are actively complying through installment payment

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We're grateful for the Legislature for holding the line on corporate fair share payments for Medi-Cal
• removal of dental benefits for the UIS population, and transitioning FQHCs from their prospective payment
• We're also grateful for the Legislature for holding the line on corporate fair share payments for Medi-Cal
• I just want to express our sincere gratitude for the delay of the Prop. 56 payment cuts for Medi-Cal
• family fees, we continue to ask for a one-year extension to July 1, 2027, in order to establish a payment

Keywords: 987, senate, all