Transcript Highlights:

• Now, this bill says notwithstanding any other provision of code to the contrary, correct?
• And not just, obviously they're not defined here, but is there anywhere else in code?
• And it refers back to—I forget the code section—but 61 on our trespass code refers back to that for posting
• The Supreme Court... ...permission as exists in West Virginia code.
• They're valuable, just like the others that we are mentioning in the code.

Keywords: 994, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• up in the block on page three is Senate Bill 302, which seeks to amend and reenact sections of the Code
• At the bottom of page four, first up is Senate Bill 386, which amends and reenacts sections of the Code
• in this new category, perhaps, is Senate Bill 530, which amends and reenacts three sections of the Code
• It amends and reenacts various sections of the Code of Virginia, repeals several others, all relating
• The delegate from Fredericksburg, Delegate Code. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I am not live today.

Keywords: March 05, 2026 - Regular Session, 976, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• states, as well as looked at the technical issues that have arisen after the revamping of the trust code
• And what we have before the trust code.
• <00:02:36.160> And elements of the revised trust code.
• And elements of the revised trust code.
• The amendment is coded A1.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• The Indiana Code says that they should report yearly. The code was to report quarterly.
• This year, Senate Bill 80 also once again reflects a code enhancement approved by the Code Revision Commission
• A code enhancement approved by the Code Revision Commission as a means to reorganize specific crowded
• chapters in the Indiana Code.
• The bill makes no substantive changes to the code.

Keywords: 964, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, so that reason only we're bringing the code sections forward.
• <00:03:11.360> I'm bringing the code sections forward.
• I'm bringing the code sections forward.
• >> No, not these are open code section. Okay. So, I wouldn't want to repeal those. >> Okay.
• this is actually creating new code this is actually creating new code section<00:05:08.479> for

Keywords: Technology - Room 210; 28 January, 2026: 9:00 AM, 925, all

Summary: The Technology Committee met a few minutes late and took up four bills. Senate Bill 2437, which establishes a baseline definition of artificial intelligence and aligns it with federal language, was explained as a recommendation from the AI regulatory task force; it passed without questions and was reported out. Senate Bill 2650, the Mississippi Emergency Communications Authority Act, was presented as a follow-up to last year’s 911 legislation to make minor, non-funding adjustments to definitions around EOCs, EOCCs, and NG 911 standards; members noted the board has not yet fully met or been confirmed, and the bill passed and was reported out. Senate Bill 2653, the Mississippi IT Optimization Act, was described as creating a new code section to improve state IT efficiency and enterprise solutions as agencies move to the cloud and data sharing expands. The chair cited consolidation efforts such as reducing multiple Microsoft mail accounts and potential cost savings, and the bill passed with no opposition. Senate Bill 2654 would establish a state security operations center to centralize cybersecurity response and related assets; after a committee substitute corrected a typographical error, the substitute was adopted and then passed as a title sufficient do pass, to be reported out. The chair also said the committee would likely see further revisions later in session, especially on the 911 and cybersecurity measures, and announced a February 5 field trip for technology committees to visit MDE from about 11 a.m. to 1 p.m., with more details to follow.

Transcript Highlights:

• AT LEAST TWO OF THE HOURS HAVE TO GO WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE BECAUSE THEY DO INTERNAL FOR MANY
• FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION CODES, FEMA REGULATIONS AND THEN WE HAVE TO TIE INTO
• TWO OF THE CODE REQUIREMENT HOURS ARE IN THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ADVANCED SECTION.
• A THOROUGH KNOWLEDGE OF THE CODE AND ALL THE CHANGES THAT HAPPEN WITH IT.
• FLORIDA BUILDING CODE IS A MINIMUM.

Transcript Highlights:

• Because I was going to say, here's the law code, because I don't care about state law.
• That is existing code in the state of West Virginia, but there's no enforcement.
• “By Section 21-1 of this code, shall be fined $100 for each offense.
• So that part, excluding E-Verify, is the existing code. Is that correct?” “Yes.”
• And so if, but this bill then says, okay, but that’s our existing code.

Keywords: 994, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• , international building code, the plumbing code, electrical code, all those things that goes into this
• , international building code, the plumbing code, electrical code, all those things that goes into this
• , international building code, the plumbing code, electrical code, all those things that goes into this
• , international building code, the plumbing code, electrical code, all those things that goes into this
• code, electrical code, the plumbing code, electrical code,<02:42:44.479> all<02:42:44.560>

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The, and the UPC code is not necessary for audit to conduct the audits.
• The UPC code reporting poses challenges for businesses selling alcoholic beverages.
• Uh, many businesses do not track using the UPC code.
• It amends tax code Section 151.462B repealing the requirement to include UPC in the RTS reports.
• But there's no requirement to have that UPC code.

Transcript Highlights:

• inspection program, we are in charge of our Chapter 1, which is in addition to the Florida Building Code
• We also do the fire codes as well.
• Well, as a professional engineer, we sign a—we have a code of ethics.
• . is for reserves in the state of Florida is essentially it's in the administrative code and it says
• It says in the bill, the goal of a milestone inspection is not to identify a code violation.

Summary: The committee on Regulated Industries convened with a quorum and began a panel discussion focused on condominium milestone inspections and structural integrity reserve studies (SIRS), with members framing the topic as part of Florida’s post-Surfside condo safety reforms. The chair and panelists reviewed how the state got here, emphasizing that the problems predated Surfside and were driven by long-term deferred maintenance, underfunded reserves, and aging buildings. Panelists included representatives from Florida Realtors, engineering and reserve-study firms, a CPA, a community association attorney, and Broward County’s building safety official, all of whom described their roles in inspections, reserve planning, and code enforcement. Testimony centered on what inspectors are finding in the field. Panelists said the most common problems are not subsidence but wear-and-tear and maintenance failures, especially in stairways, balconies, roofs, parapet walls, waterproofing, and corrosion. They described examples of buildings with hidden deterioration, hurricane-exposed damage, and associations that were underfunded despite prior inspection regimes in Miami-Dade and Broward. Dr. Barbosa explained that Miami-Dade’s recertification program began in the 1970s and Broward’s in 2005, with current timelines generally requiring notice, a first milestone review, and then time to begin substantial repairs; she said the program has improved compliance but that SIRS has added confusion. Members also raised concerns about the cost and implementation of SIRS, including whether reports are being used to generate unnecessary work, whether contractors or firms have conflicts of interest, and whether the law’s use of “fully funded” is being misunderstood. Panelists said the statutory reserve requirement is better understood as baseline funding, not having all money in the bank immediately, and suggested clearer definitions and possibly changing the terminology to “adequately funded.” They also discussed the need to separate required structural items from optional or cosmetic items in reserve reports, improve transparency for buyers and lenders, and ensure associations provide documents through websites and other portals. No votes were taken. The committee used the meeting as an information-gathering session and signaled that more panels and discussion would follow, with members and witnesses agreeing that the state may need further clarification, education, and possible statutory adjustments to reduce confusion while preserving building safety.

Transcript Highlights:

• It will lower costs and ensure code enforcement in underserved regions.
• It will enhance safety by matching licensees with specific skills and code requirements.
• Thank you. to one and two family homes per the Florida building code.
• It will enhance safety by matching licensees with specific skills and code requirements.
• "Code 4-50. Oh, Senator Bernard. Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.

Summary: The committee began by postponing SB 1742 on condos until the following week, then took up SB 1298 on building construction. Senator Simon said the bill would require continued education for long-licensed building professionals, clarify interagency sharing of building officials, limit residential inspectors to one- and two-family homes, revive a paid internship for residential planning examiners, modernize permit signatures, and clarify contractor responsibility when work changes hands. The bill drew supportive waivers and was reported favorably. Members then considered SB 940 on third-party restaurant reservation platforms. A delete-everything amendment was adopted to target bots and unauthorized resale of restaurant reservations, while preserving direct restaurant-platform relationships and requiring consumer contact information when reservations are made through noncontractual platforms. The Florida Restaurant and Lodging Association and Booking Holdings supported the measure, and CS/SB 940 was reported favorably. SB 638 on home inspectors also passed after the sponsor explained it would raise education requirements from 120 to 200 hours, add instruction on building code, wind mitigation, four-point and insurance inspections, and require $300,000 in errors-and-omissions coverage; it was reported favorably. The committee next approved SB 960 on elevator accessibility, allowing additional shorter support rails while keeping the existing 42-inch rail requirement. SB 196 on foods containing vaccines or vaccine materials was amended to address mRNA language and cosmetics safety standards, with the committee adopting amendments and then reporting the bill favorably. SB 1418 on heated tobacco products was amended to clarify the definition of heated tobacco products and exclude other forms such as hookah; it also passed favorably. The committee also recommended confirmation of a block of board and commission appointees. Finally, SB 1262 on construction contracting was amended to add contractor continuing-education topics, strengthen penalties for unlicensed activity, create a standardized disciplinary reporting system, and require timely refunds and project completion standards; it was reported favorably with support from the Florida Home Builders Association. SB 1304 on solar facilities was then approved after extensive testimony from rural county commissioners and local officials who argued that utility-scale solar on agricultural land has grown without sufficient local oversight and that decommissioning rules are needed to protect farmland and communities. The bill would repeal the current by-right treatment of solar facilities on ag land and authorize counties to adopt decommissioning ordinances; it was reported favorably after a technical amendment.

Transcript Highlights:

• House Bill 4523, a bill to amend the Estates and Protected Individuals Code.
• House Bill 4905, a bill to amend the Public Health Code. First reading of the bill.
• House Bill 5338, a bill to amend the Revised School Code. First reading of the bill.
• Chair, calendar item 90 is House Bill 4072, a bill to amend the Public Health Code.
• The bills are 1.03, a bill to amend the insurance code of 1956.

Summary: The Senate met with a quorum, excused several members, and heard a memorial statement from Majority Floor Leader Singh honoring Thomas James Cleary, a longtime Michigan public servant, lobbyist, and civic volunteer. The chamber also recognized a departing staff member from Senator Geis’s office and later welcomed guests from Cleary’s family. No substantive debate occurred during these tributes, and remarks were ordered printed in the journal. The Senate then handled a large number of introductions and referrals, including Senate Joint Resolution K to prohibit autopen use by certain executive officials, Senate bills on Treasury revenue collection and liquor control, and numerous House bills covering housing, health, insurance, natural resources, education, consumer finance, child care licensing, public employment contracts, and other topics. Several housing and finance-related House bills were sent directly to the Committee of the Whole by unanimous consent. In Committee of the Whole, bills including House Bill 4072, House Bill 5630, Senate Bills 792, 793, 947, 1013, and 885 were considered; substitutes were adopted for House Bill 5630, Senate Bills 1013, 947, and 885, and the committee recommended all of those bills, plus House Bill 4072, Senate Bills 792 and 793, for third reading. On final passage, House Bill 4042 and House Bill 5630 each passed 34-0, with four members excused. The Senate also concurred in the House substitute to Senate Concurrent Resolution 14, approving an extension of the state energy emergency, by a 33-1 vote. By contrast, concurrence in the House substitute to Senate Bill 878 failed 2-32, sending that appropriations bill to conference committee. The House then named conferees on Senate Bill 878, and the Senate named conferees for both SB 878 and HB 5630 after the chambers disagreed on those measures.

Transcript Highlights:

• The bill repeals obsolete code sections, makes technical corrections, includes technical updates, and
• includes clarifications as to applicable code sections.
• The bill also repeals obsolete code sections that were effective only until June 30, 2022.
• It's currently in code that we have to find $5 million of excess coverage.
• This bill creates a new article in the insurance code. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Keywords: 994, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Where are we getting the information about the false coding? Chair Alvarez: Thank you.
• Representative Skidmore: What is the consequence for false coding?
• If this is about coding, that is insurance fraud. This is against the law.
• Felony charges for coding. If it applies here, it is going to apply across the board.
• And the insurance companies are paying it because the codes are being manipulated.

Transcript Highlights:

• Under the school's discipline code, the girl was charged with assaulting a teacher, although she never
• This bill simply prohibits expulsions and suspensions for students who violate the dress code policy.
• It requires that dress code policies are both clear, objective, specific, and non-discriminatory, and
• This bill simply prohibits expulsions and suspensions for students who violate the dress code policy.
• code policies are both clear, objective, specific, and non-discriminatory, and applied in ways that

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The Joint Committee on Education held a public hearing on a large slate of bills, with much of the testimony focused on school discipline and student equity. Bills discussed included measures to address inequities in suspension and expulsion, clarify school exclusion rules, reduce discipline for dress and grooming violations, and expand protections related to fair educational practices. Committee members repeatedly reminded witnesses of the two-minute limit and asked for written testimony to supplement oral remarks. A substantial portion of the hearing centered on the RAISE Act and related school discipline bills, including H. 730/S. 376 and H. 731/S. 380. Testifiers from advocacy groups, legal services, and the legislature argued that exclusionary discipline disproportionately affects Black and Latino students, students with disabilities, low-income students, and DCF-involved youth. They said current law is overly broad or unclear in areas such as “assault on educational staff,” indefinite suspensions tied to felony complaints, and definitions of weapons, leading to unnecessary removals from school. Supporters said the bills would add due process, clearer definitions, and better accountability, while one legislator testified in support of the discipline reforms and opposed several other bills on the agenda. The committee also heard testimony on H. 576/S. 368, which would prohibit suspensions and expulsions for dress and grooming violations and require clearer, non-discriminatory dress code policies. Witnesses cited research and personal stories about disproportionate enforcement against Black girls, girls of color, non-binary students, and students wearing religious attire, and said the bill would prevent physical contact used to enforce dress codes. Another major topic was H. 641/S. 349, which would add “special medical status” protections in education; supporters said it would prevent exclusion based on medical decisions or conditions, though members questioned how it would interact with existing disability law and vaccination-related school requirements. The committee also heard testimony on H. 625, which would extend the ban on corporal punishment from public to private schools, with witnesses citing research on harm and disproportionate impact. Additional testimony covered bills on accelerated learning and gifted education, with parents, educators, and advocates saying Massachusetts under-identifies advanced learners and lacks adequate acceleration pathways. A senator also testified for S. 406 on recovery high schools, saying the funding formula should be updated to better support students in recovery. No votes were taken during the hearing; the chair closed testimony on several bill groups and noted that written testimony would remain open for a week.

Transcript Highlights:

• Then it has the agency code, or the department code, then it has the agency code.
• code then it has codee or the department code then it has the<00:35:03.240> agency<00:35:04.280
• > I the agency code yeah that's what I the agency code yeah that's what I wanted<00:35:06.040>
• Representative Mums, if I can see you over there, this is the codes that we talked about.
• I'm not sure how DAS assigns it, but we all do have a specific employee code attached to us, right?

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The meeting was an introductory Division One budget briefing led by Legislative Budget Assistant staff Melissa Rollins and Jack Mullen. They explained staff roles and agency assignments within Division One, noting that Jack is taking over the General Government category while Melissa handles Categories 2 and 3, and that members can contact either staffer with questions. They also reviewed the upcoming budget calendar, including the governor’s budget presentation expected in mid-February, agency hearings beginning around February 17–20, a Division One deadline around March 26, and House Finance reporting deadlines in early April. A major portion of the discussion focused on how to read fiscal notes and the difference between expenditures and appropriations. Staff used sample language to explain that a bill may show an expenditure estimate without actually authorizing funding or new positions, and that a zero appropriation means the agency is not authorized to spend the estimated amount unless the bill is amended. Members asked questions about why a bill could show costs but still not authorize spending or hiring, and staff clarified that new positions require specific legislative authorization and classification detail. They also noted that many bills will have expenditure lines without appropriations, and that amendments may be needed if the committee wants to fund or authorize the program. The rest of the meeting walked members through the HB 1 and HB 2 tracking documents used by the division. Staff explained that HB 1 tracking sheets record additional agency requests not included in the governor’s budget, including requests that may be zero-net transfers, corrections, or new spending items, and that grayed-out items indicate actions already taken. They said HB 2 will be handled through a similar tracking process, with amendments routed through LBA staff and the Office of Legislative Services. Members were told that the division will review agency budgets, class lines, and proposed changes over roughly six weeks, with the goal of preparing a detailed change report for full House Finance.

Transcript Highlights:

• We moved from codes in New Hampshire.
• And that's what fire code and building code demands be built.
• And that's what fire code and end.
• complies with safe fire code complies with safe fire code requirements<04:18:38.640> of<04
• So there is a discrepancy between our building code and fire code, and we have to fix that.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And what this bill will do is apply the Trump tax cuts to the Arizona tax code.
• And those forms assume that we are going to conform with the changes at the federal code.
• It is a common-sense, pro-taxpayer bill that conforms Arizona's tax code with the federal tax code and
• , that we now are trying to apply to the Arizona tax code with this bill.
• By conforming Arizona's tax code with the federal tax code, we provide immediate relief to seniors, working

Keywords: 1182, all

Summary: The House convened with prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, approval of the prior journal, and introductions of the Doctor of the Day and student guests, including JAG students and Hila Ben High School visitors. Attendance was recorded at 49 present, 3 absent, and 8 excused. The chamber then moved into Committee of the Whole to consider HB 2153, the annual tax conformity bill, which was described by supporters as aligning Arizona tax law with recent federal changes and providing relief through no tax on tips and overtime, a 25% increase in the child tax credit, a new child care expense deduction, and expanded senior retirement-income deductions. Opponents argued the measure would primarily benefit wealthy individuals and corporations, leave out some seniors without retirement accounts, and reduce revenue needed for public services. HB 2153 drew extensive debate and multiple questions about its effects on seniors, small businesses, wages, child care, and the timing of tax filing forms already issued by the Department of Revenue. Supporters emphasized taxpayer certainty, conformity with federal forms, and economic growth; critics said the bill was fiscally irresponsible and unfair. The Committee of the Whole approved the bill 31-26, and the House later adopted the report and referred the bill to engrossing. The House then took up the Senate mirror measure, SB 1106, substituted for HB 2153, and held floor explanations of vote. After further debate along similar lines, the House passed SB 1106 by a vote of 31-27 with 2 not voting and transmitted it to the Senate. The remainder of the session included personal privilege remarks, committee schedule announcements, a long list of first-read bills and referrals, and finally a motion to adjourn until Tuesday, January 20, 2026.

Transcript Highlights:

• Federal tax provisions, specifically Sections 45Y and 48E of the Internal Revenue Code, Sections 45U,
• It's the only means-tested production tax credit in the entire tax code.
• code.
• Just to edify us here, sections 45U, 45Y, and 45E, the eternal revenue code, not known in the tax code
• As I mentioned, it's the only means-tested credit in the whole code. That's nuclear.

Summary: The Senate Committee on Business and Commerce met with a quorum and took up a long list of pending House bills, most of them on motions by Senator King or Senator Campbell. The committee adopted committee substitutes and favorably reported numerous bills, including HB 252, HB 700, HB 1500, HB 1545, HB 1562, HB 1732, HB 267, HB 2213, HB 2221, HB 2520, HB 2818, HB 3016, HB 3214, HB 3250, HB 3512, HB 3623, HB 3689, HB 3833, HB 4063, HB 4395, HB 4690, HB 4751, HB 5331, HB 3824, HB 4464, HB 4468, and HB 5247. Most of these were sent to the local and uncontested calendar, while some, including sunset and other significant measures, were reported to the full Senate. HB 146 was the only bill reported out on a divided vote, passing 6 ayes to 4 nays. Several bills received brief explanation of committee substitute changes. HB 3016, dealing with rental car collision damage waivers and stolen vehicles, was amended to change a cooperation standard from “fully cooperate” to simply “cooperate.” HB 3689, a major ESF/TWA financing bill, was described as making technical changes to align terminology with the Comptroller’s authority and to avoid creating state debt or new liability. HB 5247, a capital cost recovery bill for transmission in the Permian Basin, was revised to clarify how the new mechanism fits with existing Utilities Code provisions and to add a 2035 expiration date. HB 3824, the battery fire safety bill, also received technical changes to align terminology with industry usage. The committee heard public testimony on several pending measures. HB 3069, which would direct the PUC to develop supplemental multi-decade planning criteria for transmission certificates in ERCOT, drew support from industry, environmental, and manufacturing witnesses who said it would help address congestion costs while balancing consumer protections; the bill was left pending. HB 5196, requiring state agencies to adopt and post telework policies and use written telework agreements, received both support and concern: supporters said it would preserve productivity and retention, while a senator raised concerns about notice and family logistics; it was left pending after testimony. HB 3112, allowing closed deliberations on cybersecurity policy details, was laid out and left pending after brief discussion. HCR 102, supporting federal nuclear tax credits, drew testimony from nuclear industry and energy advocates, who argued the credits are essential for existing plants, new nuclear development, grid reliability, and U.S. competitiveness; the resolution was left pending, with discussion about whether the language should focus more exclusively on nuclear. HB 705, creating a cosmetology licensure compact, was supported by industry, employers, and compact experts as a mobility tool that preserves state authority; HB 3516, expanding a public information exemption for Railroad Commission administrative law judges and technical examiners, and HB 3388, authorizing group property and casualty coverage for personal lines, were also heard and left pending. At the end of the meeting, the committee recessed subject to the call of the chair.

Transcript Highlights:

• Chair: House Bill 509, Code Inspector Body Cameras. You're recognized.
• transparency, accountability and professionalism in local code activities.
• Andrew Cal, Florida Association of Code Enforcement, is waiving in support.
• And I don't—do we need 90 days for code enforcement?
• And Raquel, Florida Association of Code Enforcement, waiving in support.