Transcript Highlights:

• So, locals still control.
• , so they're going to be controlling, so they're going to be responsible<00:31:37.440> regardless,
• So, it's a good control to keep students from hopping from district to district. Correct. Okay.
• c><00:32:29.400> from<00:32:29.560> hopping control to keep students from hopping control
• <00:50:09.840> over but doesn't really have any control over but doesn't really have any control

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Summary: The committee of conference on HB 751 reviewed amendment 2026-1904H page by page, focusing on open enrollment rules, capacity definitions, statewide enrollment limits, denial criteria, transportation, and funding. Members discussed clarifying that districts may set capacity at zero if they truly have no room, creating a statewide enrollment cap of 500 that can increase by 25% if it reaches 90% utilization, and exempting seats already used by open enrollment students before October 1, 2026. They also discussed how the Department of Education would allocate seats through rulemaking, while local districts would still set capacity, with grandfathered seats preserved where districts already allow open enrollment. A substantial portion of the meeting centered on when districts may deny open enrollment applications. The amendment would allow denials for reasons such as chronic absenteeism or disciplinary history, while requiring districts to consider whether those issues are tied to disability, McKinney-Vento status, foster care, or bullying. Members emphasized that such factors are to be considered, not used as the sole basis for rejection, and noted that the bill separately prohibits receiving schools from accepting or rejecting applicants based on pupil needs, special education needs, disability, aptitude, or athletic achievement. There was also discussion of whether interdistrict transfers should count toward open enrollment capacity, with a suggestion that a carve-out may be needed. The committee also reviewed provisions on program-specific capacity, continuous enrollment, and transportation. It was explained that capacity can apply to a school, grade, program, or class, including CTE programs, and that students may be denied if a specific program is full or if they do not meet prerequisites. The group clarified that open enrollment pupils would maintain continuous enrollment without reapplying, though there was concern about how that would work if district capacity changes over time. Transportation would generally be the parent’s responsibility unless required by an IEP or 504 plan, though students may use an existing bus route if seats are available and the receiving district allows it. On funding, the committee noted that the amendment changes the earlier HB 751 approach and instead ties open enrollment funding to base adequacy, differentiated aid, and an additional grant modeled on charter school funding, with dates removed at the department’s request. Members also raised concerns about how open enrollment would interact with existing tuition agreements and whether districts could use the new pathway to alter or pressure those arrangements. Department staff said districts would still be required to maintain a school of record and provide an adequate education free of charge outside the open enrollment program, and that if open enrollment enrollment became unusually large relative to district adequacy enrollment, the issue could be brought to the state board. No votes were taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• Representative De Re: Yeah, I think I have to go in on local control here.
• I do want to say that I do believe in local control, and a lot of that local control comes to somebody
• And I believe in the ultimate local control, which is our citizens.
• <00:42:39.720> works yesterday uh because local control works yesterday uh because local control
• believe at the ultimate local control believe at the ultimate local control which<00:42:43.920><

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee first took up House Bill 1/CAC 1, which concerned gubernatorial succession and incapacity. Members supporting an ITL motion said the bill was not workable as written and that New Hampshire already has a constitutional structure that has functioned for more than 200 years. Others noted the state’s two-year gubernatorial term and said the existing protections were sufficient. The committee voted 16-0 to inexpedient to legislate, and the item was placed on consent. The committee then considered House Bill 96, the energy code bill. Supporters argued that updating the code would reduce long-term energy costs, improve climate resilience, help the construction industry, and keep New Hampshire eligible for federal funding. Opponents of ITL said the bill was premature because the 2024 energy code was already under review, housing costs were a major concern, and the testimony on costs was conflicting and not well supported. The committee voted 12-4 for ITL, and a minority report was requested. House Bill 161, dealing with the Native American Affairs Commission, was also sent to ITL by a 16-0 vote and placed on consent. Members cited serious concerns about vacancies, expired terms, missing annual reports, and whether the commission was functioning effectively. Several members said the committee lacked the expertise to resolve the underlying cultural and intergovernmental disputes and that the issues were beyond the committee’s scope. Finally, the committee took up House Bill 428 and adopted Amendment 0328 by a 16-0 vote. The amendment would preserve municipalities’ ability to make administrative building-code amendments, such as permit, inspection, occupancy, and fee procedures, while still barring local governments from setting higher construction standards than the state code. Testimony emphasized that the amendment was meant to clean up and consolidate related language and make the bill administratively workable. After the amendment passed, members discussed the bill in amended form, with supporters and opponents focusing on housing costs, local control, flood protection, and the risk of inconsistent local codes.

Transcript Highlights:

• There's an annual report that the Gambling Control Board puts out.
• There's an annual report that the Gambling Control Board puts out.
• board's 2024 uh to the gambling control board's 2024 uh report<00:13:27.279> the<00:13:27.440
• The Gambling Control Board reported January was down 13% to be exact as an industry.
• The Gambling Control Board reported January was down 13% to be exact as an industry.

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The committee took up House File 169, which would change the tax structure for charitable gambling. Representative Robbins offered and the committee adopted the A1 author’s amendment, described as a technical correction to ensure sports-themed tip boards are not inadvertently taxed under the bill. Robbins then presented the bill as a way to replace the current tiered combined net receipts tax on charitable gambling with a flat 5% rate, arguing charities were being overtaxed and that prior promises of relief had not been fully delivered. Chair Stevenson pushed back on several of Robbins’ factual claims, correcting the record on the status of E-pull tabs, the share of charitable gambling revenue they represent, and the amount of tax relief already enacted in 2023 and 2024. He said E-tabs were not eliminated, that the revenue split between paper pull tabs and E-tabs is closer to 45/55, and that charities had already received a $15 million tax cut plus savings from reduced developer fees. Robbins responded that the changes still significantly reduced revenue and that the bill was intended as a middle-ground approach. Testimony largely came from charitable gambling and veterans groups in support of the bill. Rachel Jenner of Allied Charities of Minnesota said nearly 1,000 charities depend on charitable gambling, cited high taxes and fees, and said many organizations were seeing revenue declines after the new E-pull tab rules took effect. Dr. Christy Jano of the American Legion Department of Minnesota said charitable gambling funds support veterans, youth, and community programs, and that a flat 5% tax would help posts continue those efforts. Members asked about the size of the revenue drops and how much gambling proceeds go to overhead and operating costs; Jenner said the losses varied by organization and that it was too early to know the long-term effect, while Jano said some expenses are used for property taxes and building upkeep. The committee then moved on to additional testimony, including Tim Angstrom, but no final vote on the bill was taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• That is actual, I don't know, items that truly control our economy especially here in Texas.
• Philip, I'm going to ask Philip Ashley, Associate Deputy Controller for Tax.
• Yes, Philip Ashley, Associate Deputy Controller for Tax Administration.
• to the six statutorily designated regional poison control centers.
• We are also working with the Texas Poison Control Network.

Transcript Highlights:

• She, however, great rodent control.
• <00:26:37.679> is but in in case if it crowd control is but in in case if it crowd control
• Pollution Control Agency. Pollution Control Agency.
• I'm Assistant Commissioner with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
• the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Don't you have control don't understand.
• different stipulation and less control different stipulation and less control for<00:31:00.159><
• If even 1% of it was cost control.
• that public pressure comes to control that public pressure comes to control per<01:47:35.920>
• Even the amendment we can control the budget, control the people.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• For narcotic schedule two controlled For narcotic schedule two controlled substances<00:15:12.600
• <00:15:30.720> substance schedule two controlled substance schedule two controlled substance
• <00:20:54.000> prescribing from restricting controlled prescribing from restricting controlled
• controlled controlled prescribing prescribing prescribing were<00:21:15.040> written<00:21:15.440
• >> For controlled prescribing, that is currently in our legislation for controlled three through five

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The committee opened its sixth and final interim meeting with roll call, quorum confirmation, approval of the prior minutes, and a brief change in agenda order to preserve quorum and accommodate presenters’ schedules. Members then moved through several proposed health-related items with limited discussion, and the chair noted the committee would reconvene in January for further conversation. The first substantive item was a proposal relating to utilization controls for non-opioid analgesics in Medicaid. Senator Gerald Neal and Tara Hyde of People Advocating Recovery argued that pain parity is needed so patients can access non-opioid options without prior authorization or step therapy barriers, especially in acute pain situations and for people in recovery. Senator Berg supported the concept and suggested expanding the approach to other prescriptions by allowing physicians to explain why step therapy is inappropriate at the time of prescribing; another member cautioned against unintended cost increases if non-opioid drugs are used as add-ons to opioids. The committee then heard a proposal on physician assistants from Senator Scott and Andrew Rutherford of the Kentucky Academy of Physician Assistants. They described a shift from a supervisory to a collaborative practice model, with practice scope set at the practice level, limited Schedule II prescribing authority under guardrails, and permission for PAs to perform driver’s license vision testing. Supporters said the changes would improve rural access, reduce administrative burden, and align Kentucky with neighboring states; a question from Representative Bratcher focused on experience requirements and how the proposal compares with nurse practitioner rules. No vote was taken. Finally, Representative Nancy Tate, Adia Wuchner, and Representative Jason Nemes introduced a 2026 proposal aimed at “protecting vulnerable people.” They described a broad package focused on abortion pill trafficking, marketing to minors, commercial surrogacy, assisted suicide, and organ procurement safeguards, arguing that current law leaves gaps and that additional criminal and civil penalties are needed. The presentation was informational only, with no action taken before the meeting ended.

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, so I would um uh we're looking at the way in which um but also control. um but also control.
• We need to be in control of it.
• We need to be in control<00:42:11.839> of<00:42:12.079> it.
• ,<00:54:33.040> we when this body was under DFL control, we when this body was under DFL control
• <02:11:35.679> with issues that a single party control with issues that a single party control

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Tano, each will control 20 minutes.
• abuse in prescribing controlled abuse in prescribing controlled substances.<03:53:52.880> At<
• Tano, each will control 20 minutes.
• Takano, each will control 20 minutes. Takano, each will control 20 minutes.
• And the chair control 20 minutes.

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Monday, September 15, 2025, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We are a to maximize local control.
• take a local approach with local control take a local approach with local control on<00:05:20.560
• control ensures that educational control ensures that educational decisions<00:26:45.760> are
• long-standing tradition of local control long-standing tradition of local control and<00:27:09.520
• Then do you use birth control?

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee heard House Bill 1331, which would allow the town of Derry to incorporate the Derry Cooperative School District as a department of the town through a charter amendment. The prime sponsor and several supporters argued the change would increase local control, streamline overlapping town and school functions, and potentially help align school spending with Derry’s tax cap. Supporters also said Derry is large enough to warrant a structure more like Manchester or Nashua, and one witness cited a 2018 nonbinding Derry ballot question that passed 597 to 547 in favor of seeking authorization for this change. Opposition came from NEA New Hampshire President Megan Tuttle, who said the association and the Derry Education Association opposed the bill because schools are not simply another municipal department and because Derry voters had already rejected merging the district into town government. She argued the state should respect local control and the community’s prior decision. Committee members asked about the scope of the proposed charter change, the role of the school board, and the reported prior vote, and the sponsor clarified that the amendment would be limited to this specific purpose rather than opening the entire charter. The hearing then moved to House Bill 1374, which would change the procedures for withdrawing from a cooperative school district. Representative Mary Murphy said current law gives other cooperative towns too much control over a withdrawing town’s decision, and her bill would remove the requirement for approval by the other towns while raising the withdrawing town’s approval threshold to a supermajority. She pointed to Francis Town’s 2024 withdrawal vote and said the bill was intended to protect students and local decision-making. The sponsor asked for an ought to pass recommendation, and committee members asked follow-up questions about the prior withdrawal vote and the number of voters involved.

Transcript Highlights:

• The decision is not in the control of the government entity.
• The decision is not in the control of the government entity.
• <00:51:39.119> and information between controllers and information between controllers and
• Controllers are really all processors.
• And again, this is of the controllers.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• that with the available grid capacity, we have controls in place at the facility.
• storage and so to be able to control storage and so to be able to control control<00:41:27.760><
• :41:30.319> have<00:41:30.480> controls<00:41:30.880> in<00:41:31.079> place<
• /c><00:41:31.280> at capacity we have controls in place at capacity we have controls in place
• , help control power, and provide consistent power to the electrolyzer.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:42:50.960> interest Bank and divested controlling interest Bank and divested controlling
• most of them have internal controls most of them have internal controls about<01:32:00.239> making
• So there's a point where there's control costs that are not controllable, such as inflation, can be actually
• Next up, Pest Control Board with comments. My name is Candace EO.
• um until we can get this under control um until we can get this under control it<01:51:51.199>

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on several measures, beginning with SB 48 SD2 HD1 relating to combat sports. The Attorney General offered a technical comment on the bill’s effective date, and several testifiers from the combat sports community strongly supported the measure with amendments. They argued that boxing and MMA should be treated separately, that the current regulatory structure has made events too costly and reduced opportunities, and that more local oversight would help revive the sport and give youth a constructive outlet. Committee members questioned whether the bill’s medical staffing requirements would apply to boxing, MMA, or both, and whether the added requirements would increase costs and reduce access. The witness from the combat sports community said amateur boxing is already regulated through USA Boxing, that the DCCA should focus on professional boxing, and that for safety he would support two physicians and one ambulance for boxing and MMA events. The committee then took up SB 117 SD2 HD1 relating to transportation. The Department of Transportation and the Ulon Initiative testified in support, and the bicycling community was listed as supporting as well. Members focused on the bill’s rebate program for electric transportation devices, asking how successful it had been and whether removing the rebate would affect use. DOT said the program began in February 2023 and had issued about 500 rebates totaling roughly $166,000, aimed at helping people without vehicles access transportation options. The department explained that the bill would broaden access and increase the rebate amount, including additional assistance for low-income applicants. Finally, the committee heard SB 897 SD3 HD1 relating to energy and wildfire liability. The Division of Consumer Advocacy, the Public Utilities Commission, the Attorney General, Clearway Energy Group, Ulon Initiative, Kawai K, IBEW Local 1260, and Hawaiian Electric all testified in support, while the Hawaii Association for Justice was listed as opposed but not present. Supporters said the bill would help finance wildfire mitigation and infrastructure improvements through securitization, reduce wildfire risk, and address utility cost and credit concerns. Hawaiian Electric emphasized that the bill is forward-looking, would help protect customers from future wildfire-related cost increases, and requested amendments including a study on a future wildfire recovery fund. In questioning, members pressed Hawaiian Electric on the liability cap, asking whether it would have applied to the Maui wildfires and whether it would cover personal injury or wrongful death; the witness and company counsel clarified that the aggregate cap applies only to qualifying property damage, not personal injury or wrongful death, and said they would follow up on how the cap would calculate in a Maui-type event. Hawaiian Electric also said it would seek financing under the bill if enacted and updated members on settlement funding efforts, including raising the first $550 million in equity and divesting assets to help meet its obligations.

Transcript Highlights:

• But they're having trouble controlling their own classrooms, so how does this actually solve that?
• they're having trouble in controlling they're having trouble in controlling their<01:27:22.280><
• So I'm still stuck on the classroom control that teachers have.
• But teachers should have control of their classrooms currently, yeah.
• stuck on the the the classroom control stuck on the the the classroom control that<01:35:54.880>

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• If it has a potential for conflict or even physical conflict, you're trying to keep that under control
• No, it's locally controlled by the City of St. Louis or local citizens on the board.
• But I mean, it's under the state control. So I feel like if you bought it, you paid for it.
• I don't want to usurp local control.
• And I support local control, and I'm in opposition to this amendment. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Summary: The House met with prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, and approval of the previous day’s journal by a 133-0 vote. Members then spent much of the morning introducing interns, special guests, pages, and a doctor of the day, along with a recognition of Teacher Appreciation Day and a brief announcement about a Missouri contestant on American Idol. The chamber then took up a long series of Senate bills and House amendments, largely on crime, public safety, corrections, and related issues. Measures discussed included drone enforcement authority for law enforcement, a Missouri Ranger/school safety proposal and school bus stop-arm penalties, automatic expungement for certain drug offenses, Alzheimer’s and dementia training for law enforcement and adult protective services, fire hydrant testing, pseudoephedrine access, prison cell phone contraband, hands-free cell phone law fixes, critical infrastructure/copper theft, a parent-accountability bill involving minors, fentanyl trafficking, Attorney General staff carrying firearms, and a domestic violence registry. Several members raised concerns about school safety, privacy, criminal justice policy, and whether some proposals were too broad or punitive, while others emphasized public safety, victim support, and administrative clarity. The most extended debate centered on a death-penalty post-conviction relief amendment, with supporters arguing it would align Missouri law with federal procedures and speed up lengthy appeals, and opponents warning it could reduce safeguards in capital cases. After a roll call vote, that amendment was adopted 75-68. Another notable debate involved a first-responder buffer zone amendment, where supporters said it would protect officers and others during tense encounters, while opponents argued it could chill public recording of police activity. The House also adopted amendments on domestic violence protections, child abuse interview recording and camp background checks, inmate reentry documents and job preparation, and several technical fixes to previously passed bills. A point of order was sustained on one untimely distributed amendment, but most other amendments were adopted by voice vote or roll call.

Transcript Highlights:

• We're being blamed for things far outside of our control.
• So, those two concepts, local control and unfunded mandates.
• we're told that we respect local control we're told that we respect local control and<00:52:36.400
• <01:36:44.719> We<01:36:45.040> as power, control, and authority.
• We as power, control, and authority.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I mean all sorts of incident control I mean all sorts of incident control I mean all sorts of different
• last comment the lack of local control last comment the lack of local control because there I think
• we've already been local control we've already been local control we've already been referencing in
• cost and the lack of local control cost and the lack of local control because you know last year we
• the room you could talk can't control the room you could talk can't control the room you could talk

Keywords: 1136, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:40:45.480> of<00:40:45.599> our to take control of our to take control of our borders
• Congress controls the purse strings, not the president, not Elon Musk.
• Congress controls the purse strings, not the president, not Elon Musk.
• Want to control government so they can make the rules.
• Pallone, each will control 30 minutes. Mr. Speaker, I call up H.R. 27.

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Thursday, February 6, 2025, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• That produced in environmental controls.
• But I know one thing, I can't control it. I cannot control it.
• I know one thing, I can't control it. I know one thing, I can't control it.
• I<00:49:31.359> cannot<00:49:31.760> control<00:49:32.120> it.
• I I wish for I wish I cannot control it.

Keywords: Meeting Start 00:00 Attendance Roll Call 02:38 SB 178 Discussion 03:36 SB 178 Roll Call Vote 43:10 SCR 66 Discussion 47:55 SCR 66 Roll Call Vote 53:48, 958, all

Summary: The Senate Natural Resources Committee met with a quorum, approved the prior minutes, and then took up Senate Bill 178 by Senator Greg Elkins. Supporters, including representatives of the U.S. Chamber, Kentucky Chamber, Kentucky Chemistry Council, and Kentucky Association of Manufacturers, said the bill would require state environmental regulations to rely on the best available science, align with federal standards when applicable, and use technologically achievable requirements. They argued it would improve predictability for businesses, promote national uniformity, and increase public confidence in regulatory decisions. Senator Elkins and supporters also said the bill is aimed at several environmental and public health areas, including emergency response, solid waste, water quality, radiation/NORM, environmental permitting, and coal-related regulation. Committee members asked questions about what “best available science” means and whether the bill duplicates existing law. Supporters responded that it means reliable, unbiased, peer-reviewed, scientifically sound studies and that the bill is intended to reduce political influence in regulatory decisions. They also said similar measures had passed in Tennessee and Alabama. Some senators expressed concern that science is already political and asked for clarification on the bill’s scope. Opponents, including Audrey Ernsberger of the Kentucky Resources Council, research scientist Erin Haynes, and attorney Katherine Harcourt Rice, argued that SB 178 would sharply limit Kentucky’s ability to protect public health and the environment. They said the bill would prevent agencies from adopting stronger protections than federal minimums, create ambiguity and regulatory paralysis, and impose an overly restrictive scientific standard. They also objected to language requiring a direct causal link and manifest bodily harm, saying it would force agencies to wait until people are already sick before acting. Harcourt Rice argued the bill is duplicative of existing law and evidentiary rules. No final vote or other action on SB 178 was taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• The only revenue source we can really control is the property tax, and you can only control your revenue
• So for us, this is mostly a local control issue.
• Local control in this republic that we call...
• Inflation got way out of control.
• That's a fact, and local control can't control the local market.

Bills: HB17, HB23, SB 10

Keywords: property tax, school funding, enrollment changes, inflation adjustment, tax rate notice, property tax exemption, ad valorem tax, Texas Tax Code, nonprofit corporation, charitable organization, educational nonprofit, scientific nonprofit, agriculture support, youth programs, community education, county population threshold, large county, local government revenue, leasehold interest, possessory interest