Transcript Highlights:

• That's Section 6.5.
• So on Section 8, I was looking at the... Um, I was looking at Section 8, lines 31 through 33.
• And so I didn't see the section, but what section deals with the absentee ballot and how it is counted
• So that's really what Section 1 does.
• Has it changed on section 4.3 and section 4.7, where the fiscal notes are?

Bills: AB49, AB169, AB188, AB284, AB296, AB306, AB356, AB366, AB467, AB499, AB515, AB540, AB542, AB595

Keywords: educational personnel, teacher licensing, reciprocal licensure, provisional teaching, school counselors, school nurses, school social workers, state education standards, health insurance, speech-language pathology, stuttering, rehabilitative services, habilitative services, coverage requirements, health plans, retired public employees, subsidy, Medicare, health reimbursement arrangement, Public Employees' Benefits Program

Transcript Highlights:

• Section 249.
• So section 22C, section 32 is the first of the Massachusetts statutes I'll discuss.
• So General Laws Chapter 22C, Sections 33 through 35, the following sections provide for 22C, Sections
• It's under 265, Section 37.
• Yeah, I think that's chargeable under Section 37 and Section 39.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The Special Commission on Anti-Semitism met to focus on the role of law enforcement in responding to anti-Semitic incidents. After approving amended minutes, the chair opened with remarks emphasizing that the Commission would confront anti-Semitism from any political direction and outlined the day’s agenda: extremist activity trends, hate-crime statutes, intergovernmental coordination, and security funding. The first presentation came from Ben Pott of the ADL Center on Extremism, who described rising extremist propaganda and anti-Semitic incidents nationally and in Massachusetts, highlighting groups such as NSC-131, GDL, and Patriot Front. He said these groups increasingly use anti-Zionist language, public disruptions, and online platforms to spread hate, and recommended prosecution where possible, civil litigation, education about symbols and tactics, and community reporting to law enforcement and ADL. Assistant District Attorney David Solvin then reviewed federal and Massachusetts hate-crime laws, including federal civil-rights and hate-crime statutes and state provisions for civil-rights violations, assault and battery to intimidate, religious vandalism, terroristic threats, and criminal harassment. He explained that many of these laws enhance penalties based on bias motivation, but some do not create standalone offenses or qualify as dangerousness predicates under current law. Commissioners pressed him on hypothetical fact patterns involving anti-Semitic slurs, symbols, and attacks, as well as on the limits of existing law for pretrial detention and the need for better data collection. Solvin said more training, better reporting, and possible legislative updates could improve enforcement, and he noted pending bills that would require more regular hate-crime reporting and expand protected classes. Detective Lieutenant Ryan Cepiel of the State Police Anti-Terrorism Unit and HART described the unit’s creation in 2023, its role in implementing prior hate-crime task force recommendations, and its work with local, state, federal, and community partners. He said HART has trained civil-rights officers, developed recruit and in-service curricula, created resource pamphlets and a Teams page, and is building a GIS-based reporting portal to improve tracking and victim support. Cepiel reported a year-over-year rise in reported anti-Semitic hate crimes in Massachusetts, while noting that current numbers are incomplete because reporting is inconsistent and there is no mandate for local departments to notify HART. Commissioners discussed underreporting, rural versus eastern Massachusetts coverage, the need for more officers and training, and the importance of making victims feel safe coming forward. The meeting ended with agreement that better data, training, and coordination are needed to address the rise in anti-Semitic hate and bias incidents.

Transcript Highlights:

• So that's captured in that section.
• ><c> that's</c><01:06:38.040><c> happening</c> section.
• The problem that's happening section.
• </c> there is a section within our rules. there is a section within our rules.
• like specific section within this rule, like 501. 501. 501.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Summary: The conference committee first discussed HB 1099, which creates a committee to study private business providing special education services and local school district reimbursement. Members explained that the issue is broader than special education alone, involving residential placements, foster care, court-ordered placements, and questions about which entity pays for education and care costs when students are placed in residential facilities. The House proposed an amendment to expand the study to include students placed in residential facilities by school districts as well as those placed through episodes of treatment or court order, and members agreed the existing commission would not resolve the issue before its July 1, 2026 expiration. Representative Coker raised concern about the phrase “but not limited to,” but members said the broader language was needed to capture placements beyond the existing statutory categories. The committee then agreed to accede to the Senate version of HB 1099 with a committee amendment, and the House voted unanimously to adopt amendment 2026-1845H. The bill was placed on the consent calendar, and the meeting adjourned. The transcript also includes a separate conference committee discussion on HB 1807, concerning mandatory reporting to voters. The main dispute was how to present administrator compensation: the House favored total administrative cost, while the Senate initially preferred average administrator salary. Members debated whether voters would be better informed by totals or averages, and whether the bill should define “administrator” more clearly by reference to DOE rules. The committee reached a tentative compromise to add both an average administrator salary graph and a total administrator cost graph, define administrators by reference to ED 501.02(B), scale the graph more precisely, and list the top 10 highest-paid administrators plus any employee earning over $100,000. Both chambers then gave unanimous support to the revised approach, with the understanding that the draft would be finalized and signed later.

Transcript Highlights:

• Amending Section 31-4401A, Idaho Code, to define a term and to make technical corrections.
• Amending Section 31-4403, Idaho Code, to revise provisions regarding operation and maintenance of solid
• Amending Section 31-4407A, Idaho Code, to revise provisions regarding changes and status of major waste
• generators and municipalities. ...amending Section 31-4902, Idaho Code, to define a term and to make
• Amending Section 31-4906, Idaho Code, to revise a provision regarding powers of the board of directors

Keywords: 989, all

Summary: The House convened with 67 members present, approved the journal, welcomed a substitute member, and received Senate messages and committee reports. Several bills were printed, referred, or advanced, including new House bills on medical advanced healing, state affairs, solid waste, public assistance, and other topics. The House also received and processed multiple committee recommendations, including bills on health and welfare, judiciary, state affairs, and commerce, along with enrollment and transmittal of previously passed bills. On the floor, the House passed a series of measures after debate. These included House Bills 838 and 721 on budget-process and plan-review issues, House Bill 817 on a mobile cigar business permit, House Bill 752 on restroom/changing-room restrictions, House Bill 680 on recording child abuse investigative interviews, House Bill 860 on medical parental rights-related fixes, House Bill 875 on vacancy-based personnel budget calculations, House Bill 876 on the State Board of Education maintenance budget, House Bill 877 on vocational rehabilitation rent, and House Bill 795 responding to litigation concerns over House Bill 710. House Joint Memorial 18, urging Congress to prohibit unauthorized solar geoengineering over Idaho, also passed. Later, the House suspended rules to take up and pass House Bill 826 on the Honey Commission, House Bill 832 on CTE professional qualification rules, House Bill 843 on the homeowners exemption, House Bill 872 on ballot formatting for constitutional amendments and initiatives, and Senate Bills 1242, 1243, and 1283 on potato commission cleanup, soil and water conservation code cleanup, and direct sales from small producers. Senate Bill 1373, a maintenance appropriation for economic development agencies, also passed. Most measures were approved with little or no debate, though several drew discussion over budget process, education funding cuts, election administration, and restroom policy.

Transcript Highlights:

• And today we signed in as other on the bill, of which we are concerned with two sections.
• Additionally, Section 4 of the legislation contains reporting requirements.
• Secondly, we have concerns with Section 6.
• Section 6 restricts the use of existing hydropower after 2030.
• We do have concerns with one section of the bill at the end of Section 3, which assumes that the utility

Bills: HB2338, HB2367, HB2426, HB2606

Keywords: weatherization, energy efficiency, community projects, sustainability, environment, coal-fired plant, preferential treatment, energy policy, electric generation, regulatory reform, pollution control, efficiency, appeals process, environmental regulation, hearing board, data protection, privacy, performance measures, reporting requirements, office of privacy

Transcript Highlights:

• It's in section uh one uh 2 3B there.
• It's in section uh one uh 2 3B there.
• It's in section uh one uh 2 3B there.
• It's in section uh one uh 2 3B there.
• Uh, has that section 189A... Um, section two lays out some specific fines as well.

Keywords: Meeting start: 00:00 Roll Call: 00:04 HB 168 discussion: 01:39 HB 168 vote: 21:04, 958, all

Transcript Highlights:

• This entire section is within the floodplain.
• However, it's just one section of the road.
• This entire section is within the floodplain.
• section that we replaced was only about a third of a mile.
• However, it's just one section of the road.

Summary: The committee first met in brief executive session and advanced Senate Bill 5989 without recommendation to the Ways and Means Committee. Staff explained the bill would redistribute sales tax on aircraft fuel, affecting general fund revenue, which was why it was better suited for Ways and Means. The motion passed by voice vote. The committee then heard a presentation from Transportation Secretary Julie Meredith on WSDOT’s 2025 work and 2026 priorities. She highlighted agency reorganization, safety initiatives, preservation needs, bridge strikes and storm damage, ferry service improvements, major projects such as Revive I-5, the Interstate Bridge Replacement Project, fish passage work, and preparations for the World Cup. Members praised the department’s communication and work, and asked about additional paving and preservation funding; Meredith said WSDOT had prepared projects that could be advanced if more money were available. Washington State Ferries Assistant Secretary John Vizina and staffer Jenna Forty followed with a detailed briefing on vessel and terminal preservation. They described the aging fleet, the need for new hybrid-electric vessels, the governor’s proposed funding for three additional ferries and life-extension work on older vessels, and the importance of terminal upgrades such as Fauntleroy. Senators asked about service contingency planning, the cost and timing of hybrid versus diesel vessels, and whether additional vessels would require rebidding; staff said hybrid-electric construction is the fastest path and that any expansion would depend on statutory direction and legal review. The committee then heard from local government representatives on preservation and storm recovery. The Association of Washington Cities and the Transportation Improvement Board described city road and bridge needs, limited local funding, and the importance of sustained preservation investment and programmatic grants. County representatives from the Washington State Association of County Engineers, Snohomish County, and the County Road Administration Board discussed the December flooding, road washouts, bridge damage, and recovery costs, emphasizing that counties face large preservation backlogs and need state and federal help for repairs and resiliency.

Transcript Highlights:

• Madam Chair, committee members, the specific sections of the bill that we're asking for changes: Section
• Sections 2A and 2B would allow the Council to have preferences on goods and services or construction.
• Madam Chair, committee members, the specific sections of the bill that we're asking for changes: Section
• :40.839><c> changes</c><00:15:41.839><c> section</c><00:15:42.279><c> one</c> asking for changes section
• </c> 12% and then further section 12% and then further section 2B<00:16:17.240><c> and</c><00:16:17.480

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• House Bill 2048, an act amending Section 13-3602, relating to orders of protection, process service.
• House Bill 2611, an act amending various sections of the Arizona Revised Statutes, relating to child
• The Committee on Rules recommends section 8-26-11. Mr.
• House Bill 2198, an act amending Section 13-911, Arizona Revised Statutes, relating to restoration of
• House Bill 2764, an act amending Title 15, Chapter 2, Article 3, Arizona Revised Statutes, Section 15

Keywords: 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• If you go to section two, page two, rather, section four, the preemption language starting on line four
• If you will take the bill, and if you will look at page one, section two, starting on.
• My point is, kick this section. You don't need it for vaccines. That's my testimony.
• Kane, would you please go back over that section? We're looking at section 2 on page 2.
• Kane, I appreciate you bringing that section to sort of my attention.

Summary: The House Health and Welfare Committee first heard Senate Bill 1292, which would require prospective foster parents to complete 10 hours of basic training before licensure, replacing the current practice where most training is available but optional. Senator Brandon Shippey said the bill was developed with the Department of Health and Welfare as a middle ground between burdensome in-person training and no training at all, with the goal of improving foster parent retention and child safety. A foster parent testified in support, describing crises among new foster families who had not taken training. The committee moved the bill to the floor with a due pass recommendation, and it passed unanimously. The committee then took up House Bill 862, creating an Idaho Rural Health Transformation Fund and oversight committee for federal rural health transformation dollars. Rep. Jordan Redmond said the bill was intended to give the legislature oversight of nearly $1 billion in federal funds over five years and to ensure grants include sustainability plans. Members raised concerns about whether the state should accept the funds at all, whether committee members would be paid, and what happens when the money runs out. Supporters argued the bill was about legislative oversight and accountability, while opponents warned it resembled unsustainable federal spending and criticized the underlying federal program. The bill was sent to the floor with a due pass recommendation, with three no votes recorded. The committee began hearing House Bill 808, an expanded medical freedom bill that would make school and daycare immunizations voluntary, make the immunization registry opt-in rather than opt-out, and limit local governments from imposing medical mandates. The sponsor and supporters said the bill would protect informed consent, prevent coercion, and clarify that the Medical Freedom Act applies statewide. Opponents, including pediatricians, nurses, and school nurses, argued it would weaken public health protections, reduce immunization rates, and make it harder to track and prevent outbreaks. An insurer and other witnesses also warned that the bill’s language could unintentionally restrict emergency responders and public hospitals from recommending or providing medical care. The committee did not finish testimony and recessed, planning to continue the hearing the next day.

Transcript Highlights:

• Parents and school employees would also be given a written copy of the relevant code section before a
• They wanted to delete Section C3-2, where... ...to delete Section C3-2, where there are two pilot regions
• It's in code section itself is 61-7-7, subparagraph C, new subdivision 5.
• There were two penalty sections, five and seven, and there still are two penalty sections, but we renamed
• The penalties for failure to maintain records—you see that in the section heading there for Section 5

Keywords: 994, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It's under section where is it?
• It skips over from section 2 to section 4. not that it is the department of general not that it is the
• </c> appear to conflict with uh HRS sections appear to conflict with uh HRS sections 302A-151 302A-151
• </c> over from section two to section four. over from section two to section four.
• </c> four subsection E that's under section four subsection E that's under section two<01:43:18.400><

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on HB 1783, which would expand public-private partnership options for charter school facilities. The Department of Education offered comments, the Charter School Commission and SFA supported the bill, and Hawaii Technology Academy, Hawaii Kids, Hawaii Children’s Action Network, HGA, Aloha Project, and several individuals testified in support, while UPW opposed it. Supporters said charter schools need faster and more flexible ways to address severe facility shortages and high costs, and SFA described the bill as a pilot model that could leverage developer partnerships and state contributions, citing Maryland as an example. Members asked whether the bill was limited to charter schools; DOE said the language could be read to include other public school facilities, but if focused only on charter schools, DOE was less concerned. The Charter School Commission also described an existing public-private preschool model through Parkway Village Preschool and PACTED. The committee then took up HB 1778, which would establish a CIP database for school facilities. SFA supported the bill, saying it would create a more disciplined, transparent basis for funding decisions by documenting facility condition, needed repairs, classification, and timing. DOE initially said it rested on its comments, then responded to questions by saying it already maintains deferred maintenance lists, uses systems such as Maximo, CPT, GIS, and finance software, and sends legislators project-status letters twice a year. DOE said it is working on improving its outward-facing dashboard and integrating its systems, but questioned whether the bill would add value beyond existing tools. Members emphasized the need for a publicly accessible, real-time transparency tool, while DOE said it was still evaluating its current systems and was not yet seeking funding for a new IT program. For HB 2344, creating an Independent Public School Realignment and Closure Commission, DOE said it wants to remain part of any consolidation process to keep students and education central, while SFA said the bill is timely and framed it as a restructuring response to changing conditions and possible federal funding cuts. SFA compared the proposal to the federal BRAC process for military base closures and said Hawaii has the same enrollment as in 1961 but many more schools, arguing that the state needs a more deliberate approach to school closures and land reuse. The Attorney General’s office raised technical concerns about several sections, including unclear references to administrative support, a governor-approval sequence, a possible conflict with existing statutes governing closed-school disposition, and a missing section number. Testimony on HB 2345, which would establish a geographic CIP district, began with DOE in opposition; DOE said the bill would duplicate existing work, add confusion by creating two agencies doing the same thing, and spend money inefficiently because district project coordinators and project lists already exist.

Transcript Highlights:

• Yeah, just that entire section number five there. I'm sorry, I don't understand what you're saying.
• And then would you be able to speak on page two, section five, number five there, about the section Chapter
• And then would you be able to speak on page two, section five, number five there, about the section chapter
• And I've highlighted for you a section of the rule which has been omitted from this statute.
• And I've highlighted for you a section of the rule which has been omitted from this statute.

Summary: The Committee for Insurance met with a quorum and first took up three bills in executive session. House Bill 2902 was amended with a committee substitute that removed the commission language while keeping provisions on software and key-emulating devices, and members confirmed it still included a Class D felony penalty. The committee adopted the substitute and voted the bill do pass, with one member voting no. House Bill 1789, dealing with delivery network companies and insurance coverage during the delivery availability period, was also amended and adopted; the substitute clarified that the availability period is not commercial activity and that auto insurance applies until a driver is actually engaged in delivery. The committee then voted the bill do pass, with one no vote and one present. House Bill 1647 was amended to remove it from the collateral source rule section and clarify that it applies only to civil actions for damages and property claims; the substitute was adopted and the bill voted do pass, with several no votes recorded. The committee then held a public hearing on House Bill 1894, which would implement federal nondiscrimination requirements for licensed health care providers in Missouri insurance law. The sponsor said the bill is about patient choice, fairness, and access, especially in rural areas, and does not expand scope of practice or require coverage of new services. Supporters from chiropractic, nursing, occupational therapy, podiatry, and nurse anesthetist groups said the bill would ensure equal reimbursement for the same covered services and improve access to local providers. Opponents from the insurance industry argued the bill would interfere with network design, reduce negotiating leverage, and require equal payment regardless of provider type or credentials; they also said current federal law already governs network adequacy and that the bill’s rulemaking language was standard but the reimbursement mandate was the main concern. The committee also heard House Bill 3314, which updates Missouri’s insurance guaranty association laws. The sponsor and supporters explained that the bill would clarify coverage for cyber policies, ensure coverage follows the policyholder in insurance business transfer or corporate division transactions, and allow limited pre-liquidation information sharing from the Department of Commerce and Insurance to guaranty associations so claims can be handled faster after insolvency. Witnesses said the bill is technical and intended to modernize the system without expanding coverage or increasing taxpayer exposure. Members asked about the $300,000 property and casualty claims cap, the definition of high-net-worth individual, oversight of guaranty associations, and confidentiality concerns; supporters said the cap is longstanding, high-net-worth means over $25 million, and the department’s existing oversight and confidentiality protections are sufficient. The hearing closed after a final supportive statement from the Missouri Insurance Coalition, and the committee adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• It also adds a section.
• That would be a change within Section 5 that should be pulled out.
• Section 5 should just remain as is. Thank you.
• That would be a change within Section 5 that should be pulled out.
• Section 5 should just remain as is. Thank you. So, Rep.

Summary: The Revenue and Taxation Committee met on March 2, 2006, and first introduced RS 33-260, a proposal by Representative Cannon to amend Idaho’s Community Infrastructure District Act. Cannon said the bill would extend CID authority from cities to counties, allow CIDs to fund fire protection and emergency medical services, and require CIDs to terminate after a set period rather than continue indefinitely. On motion, the committee agreed to introduce the RS with Section 5 left unchanged, and the motion carried without opposition. The committee then heard House Bill 734 from Representative Furman, which would change how wind and geothermal tax revenues are distributed among taxing districts when a school district lacks a supplemental levy. Furman said the bill was intended to prevent schools from being pressured to run levies just to qualify for revenue distribution and would use the larger of certain local levy rates instead. He said the Idaho School Board Association supported the bill and the Idaho Association of Counties was neutral. After brief questions and no public testimony, the committee voted to send HB 734 to the floor with a due pass recommendation. House Bill 670, sponsored by Representative Monks, drew the most discussion. Monks said it was meant to clarify last year’s urban renewal law so fire districts could opt out of urban renewal areas when there were no outstanding bonds or contractual obligations, and he argued fire districts were losing revenue while still providing service to new development. Testimony from the Association of Idaho Cities, the Eagle Urban Renewal Agency, and the Redevelopment Association of Idaho opposed the bill, warning it would further erode urban renewal financing, create ambiguity, and interfere with ongoing litigation over the meaning of contractual obligations. After debate over legislative intent and the effect on urban renewal districts, the committee approved HB 670 and sent it to the House floor with a due pass recommendation.

Transcript Highlights:

• by section, and is now before the Senate for final consideration.
• by section, and placed before the Senate for final consideration.
• We're actually repealing a whole section of code and creating this new section to make it constitutional
• by section, and placed before the Senate for final consideration.
• Section by section and placed before the Senate for final consideration. Is there an objection?

Summary: The Senate convened with a quorum, approved the prior day’s journal, and received committee reports and House messages. Several bills and appointments were routed to committees or placed on the calendar, including a gubernatorial appointment of David Bobbitt to the Idaho Fish and Game Commission, House Bill 526 for second reading, House Bill 494 for possible amendment, and multiple other bills reported out of committee. The chamber also received House bills 501, 558, 608, and 636 and introduced Senate Bills 1329 and 1330. The Senate then considered and passed Senate Bill 1232, which updates Idaho’s “Son of Sam” law to focus on criminal proceeds rather than speech, with supporters emphasizing constitutional safeguards and victim protections. Senate Bill 1250 also passed, exempting certain photos, including images of deceased persons, from public disclosure while allowing specified family members to request copies. Senate Bill 1236 passed after extended debate; it repeals obsolete statutory language concerning the Idaho Women’s Commission, with supporters calling it code cleanup and opponents arguing the commission’s history and mission still matter. The chamber also passed Senate Bill 1247, requiring E-Verify for state and local governments and larger government contractors, with supporters framing it as a modest enforcement tool and opponents warning it is a flawed federal system that may encourage identity fraud. The session concluded with miscellaneous announcements and an adjournment motion, and the Senate adjourned until the next day at 11 a.m.

Transcript Highlights:

• All right, Section C. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
• Section D. Thank you, Mr. Chair. We're in section D. Section D. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
• Section D, these are appropriation and/or fund transfer requests.
• Section F. These are cash fund appropriation requests. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Section F.
• Section G. Mr. Chair, we're in Section G.

Keywords: 1204, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Additionally, Section 4203 of the penal code prohibits a person from...
• The committee substitute amends a drafting error in section. one of the bill.
• 3, I'm sorry, Section 3 on page H2, the bill amends the text code.
• in the committee substitute is now a different section.
• And so it describes the activities identified in that section.

Bills: SB682, SB1013, SB1369, SB1422, SB2001, SB2080, SB2366, SB2705, SB2841

Keywords: memorial highway, Captain Kevin Williams, Firefighter Austin Cheek, Smith County, transportation, pedestrian right-of-way, sidewalk users, bicycle safety, micromobility, electric scooter, motor-assisted scooter, electric personal assistive mobility device, skateboard, roller skates, driveway crossing, alley crossing, traffic safety, yield law, Texas Transportation Code, vehicle-pedestrian collision

Transcript Highlights:

• by section, and placed before the Senate for final consideration.
• by section, and placed before the Senate for final consideration.
• by section, and placed before the Senate for final consideration.
• by section, placed before the Senate for final consideration.
• Journal should be read at length, section by section, and placed before the Senate for final consideration

Summary: The Senate convened with all 35 members present, approved the previous day’s journal, received committee reports, and heard several introductions and page swearing-in ceremonies. Messages from the Governor and House were read, and multiple bills were advanced through first and second reading, including measures on education civics instruction, irrigation districts, state symbols, county jail prisoner costs, foreign laws, police dogs, hospital districts, driver training, agriculture license plates, and forest products commission procedures. On third reading, the Senate passed Senate Bill 1254, which amends the Chiropractic Practice Act to clarify that certain certified chiropractors may prescribe limited products such as vitamins, minerals, fluids, and epinephrine for administration in their offices. The Senate also passed House Bill 533, removing the vehicle registration sticker requirement; supporters cited cost savings and modern plate-check technology, while opponents raised law-enforcement concerns. Senate Bill 1258 also passed after debate over a new distillery license for qualifying agricultural producers, with supporters framing it as a rural business and agritourism measure and critics warning about liquor-law carve-outs. The Senate further passed House Bill 502, which moves Idaho Forest Products Commission rules and related provisions into statute, and House Bill 555, a rewrite of solid waste facility law shifting more regulatory authority to the Department of Environmental Quality and updating landfill oversight. Votes on these bills were largely bipartisan, with HB 502 passing unanimously and the others passing by comfortable margins. The chamber then moved to miscellaneous business, announced a deadline for amendments, and adjourned until the next day.

Transcript Highlights:

• So, section one...
• Okay, section 4.5.
• Housing aid, sections 4.25 to 4.26.
• Section 7, local housing trust funds, sections 6.1 to 6.2, changes the time frame for a grantee to use
• Section 8, the high-rise sprinkler program, sections 6.16 to 6.17, addresses the height requirements

Transcript Highlights:

• The applicable sections are 11-52 as well as 11-88 of the water boards.
• </c><00:01:36.960><c> sections</c> Uh the section the applicable sections Uh the section the applicable
• sections are<00:01:37.520><c> 11-52</c> are 11-52 are 11-52 um<00:01:40.880><c> as</c><00:01:41.040>
• So, there could be, because we're only dealing with sections 11-52. size of the municipality?
• </c> We're only dealing with sections 11-52, which is, you know, and then 11-88.

Keywords: 1136, house, all