To enact section 5501.84 of the Revised Code to prohibit the purchase of small unmanned aircraft systems manufactured or assembled by a covered foreign entity.
Summary
HB317 would add a new section to the Ohio Revised Code restricting public entities from buying, acquiring, funding, or eventually operating certain small unmanned aircraft systems, commonly known as drones, if they are manufactured or assembled by a “covered foreign entity.” The bill defines covered foreign entities broadly to include entities on federal restricted lists, entities domiciled in China or Russia, entities controlled by those governments, and their subsidiaries or affiliates.
The bill also bars the use of state funds in connection with such drone systems, including funds provided through contracts, grants, or cooperative agreements. In addition, beginning May 1, 2027, public entities would be prohibited from operating drones made or assembled by covered foreign entities, extending the restriction beyond procurement to existing use. The measure is aimed at state and local government purchasing and operations rather than private ownership or use.
Impact
If enacted, HB317 would create a new procurement and operational restriction for Ohio state agencies, political subdivisions, public universities, and other public entities. It would effectively prohibit public spending on drones tied to certain foreign entities and would require public entities to avoid operating those systems after the effective date for the operational ban. The bill would also influence how state funds are administered in grants, contracts, and cooperative agreements involving drone technology, likely requiring compliance review and vendor screening.
Sentiment
Because the bill was only introduced and no committee transcript or vote record is available, there is no documented floor or committee sentiment in the provided materials. The bill’s framing suggests a security- and supply-chain-focused approach, and the listed cosponsors indicate some initial legislative support. Overall, the available record shows a straightforward policy proposal without recorded public debate in the supplied context.
Contention
The main potential point of contention is the breadth of the term “covered foreign entity,” which reaches not only entities on federal restricted lists but also entities domiciled in China or Russia and their affiliates. Critics could view that definition as overinclusive or difficult to administer, while supporters would likely argue it is necessary to protect public procurement and critical technology from foreign influence. Another likely issue is the delayed operational ban date of May 1, 2027, which may raise questions about replacement costs, existing fleet transitions, and compliance burdens for public entities.
To amend sections 3517.12, 3517.13, and 3517.155 of the Revised Code to modify the Campaign Finance Law regarding foreign nationals and statewide initiatives and referenda and to declare an emergency.
To amend sections 3517.12, 3517.13, and 3517.155 of the Revised Code to modify the Campaign Finance Law regarding foreign nationals and statewide initiatives and referenda and to declare an emergency.
To amend sections 3505.01 and 3505.10 of the Revised Code to modify the deadline for a political party to certify its nominees for President and Vice-President to the Secretary of State.
To delay the deadline for a major political party to certify its presidential and vice presidential candidates to the Secretary of State for the 2024 general election.