Extending the deadline for the automatic rescission of certain applications made by the Texas Legislature to the United States Congress to call a national convention under Article V of the United States Constitution for proposing any amendment to that constitution.
Impact
The extension proposed by SJR52 means that the legislative applications for a constitutional convention will not be automatically rescinded, allowing for continued discussions on potential amendments to the Constitution. This action could impact state laws regarding federal authority and fiscal policies, as proponents argue it provides a necessary check on federal powers. Such measures reflect a legislative priorities shift emphasizing states' rights and limitations on federal governmental powers.
Summary
Senate Joint Resolution 52 (SJR52) aims to extend the deadline for the automatic rescission of certain applications made by the Texas Legislature to Congress for calling a national convention under Article V of the U.S. Constitution. Originally, an application was passed in 2017 (SJR2) that called for such a convention for issues like fiscal restraints on the federal government. SJR52 extends the sunset provision from 2025 to 2033, thereby allowing Texas to maintain its call for a convention of states for an additional eight years before reconsideration is necessary.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SJR52 is divided, with strong support from certain conservative groups advocating for state autonomy from federal control. Supporters argue that extending the convention call is crucial for protecting state interests and ensuring a balanced federal system. In contrast, opponents, including various activist organizations, view the bill as a threat to the existing constitutional framework, raising concerns about the consequences of opening the Constitution to amendments.
Contention
Key points of contention include the fear that pushing for a convention may lead to unintended amendments that could undermine civil rights or essential governmental functions. Critics have expressed that this move is unnecessary and may lead to more frequent calls for such conventions, potentially creating legislative instability. Notably, the debate reveals a significant ideological divide over the balance of power between state and federal governments, reflecting broader national discussions on governance.
Rescinding the automatic rescission of certain applications made by the Texas Legislature to the United States Congress to call a national convention under Article V of the United States Constitution for proposing any amendment to that constitution.
Rescinding the automatic rescission of certain applications made by the Texas Legislature to the United States Congress to call a national convention under Article V of the United States Constitution for proposing any amendment to that constitution.
Applying to the Congress of the United States to call a convention under Article V of the United States Constitution for the limited purpose of proposing one or more amendments to the constitution to impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, to limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and to limit the terms of office of federal officials and members of Congress.
States findings of the Legislature and requests that Congress call a convention for proposing amendments under Article V of the Constitution of the United States.
Applying to the United States Congress under Article V of the United States Constitution to call for a convention for proposing an amendment to the constitution establishing congressional term limits.
States findings of the Legislature and makes three separate applications to the United States Congress to call a convention of the states under Article V of the Constitution of the United States.
A resolution to direct the Clerk of the House of Representatives to only present to the Governor enrolled House bills finally passed by both houses of the One Hundred Third Legislature.
Relating to nonsubstantive additions to, revisions of, and corrections in enacted codes, to the nonsubstantive codification or disposition of various laws omitted from enacted codes, and to conforming codifications enacted by the 88th Legislature to other Acts of that legislature.