RETIREMENT/MUNICIPAL POL: Provides relative to earnable compensation for employees in the Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System (OR SEE ACTUARIAL NOTE APV)
Summary
HB 993 revises the definition of “earnable compensation” for members of the Municipal Police Employees’ Retirement System (MPERS). Under current law, earnable compensation includes an employee’s full monthly compensation and state supplemental pay, but excludes overtime. The bill keeps that framework and expressly adds several other exclusions: any nonrecurring lump-sum payment, ad hoc bonus, recruitment incentive, hiring or signing bonus, retention incentive or bonus, and any other one-time award that is not part of regular recurring salary.
The bill applies prospectively only to compensation earned in pay periods ending on or after July 1, 2026. It is a technical but financially significant retirement measure because the definition of earnable compensation affects the amount of pay on which retirement contributions are based and, ultimately, the calculation of retirement benefits for MPERS members. The bill amends R.S. 11:2213(10) and would change how certain forms of supplemental or incentive pay are treated for retirement purposes going forward.
Impact
HB 993 would narrow the pay items counted as earnable compensation under the Municipal Police Employees’ Retirement System, reducing the retirement-creditable base for future pay periods by excluding one-time bonuses and incentives. This would affect municipal police employees, participating employers, and MPERS administration by clarifying contribution and benefit calculations for compensation earned on or after July 1, 2026. Because the bill is prospective, it does not alter treatment of compensation earned before that date.
Sentiment
The available context shows no recorded committee debate or vote history, so there is no documented opposition or support in the materials provided. Based on the bill text, the measure appears to be a targeted retirement-definition clarification rather than a broad policy change. The inclusion of an actuarial note in the caption suggests the bill may have fiscal implications that were likely relevant to consideration, but no discussion transcript is available to show how members viewed those impacts.
Contention
The main likely point of contention is whether excluding bonuses, incentives, and other one-time awards from earnable compensation unfairly limits retirement credit for police employees who receive a meaningful portion of pay through such compensation. On the other hand, supporters would likely view the exclusions as necessary to prevent temporary or irregular payments from inflating pension calculations and retirement liabilities. Any fiscal concerns would primarily involve MPERS, municipal police employers, and employees whose compensation packages include recruitment, retention, or signing incentives.
Provides relative to the administration and participation in the Deferred Retirement Option Plan for the Firefighters' Retirement System (EN SEE ACTUARIAL NOTE APV)
Provides for training of elected officials of municipalities and certain municipal employees relative to public contracts. (gov sig) (EN NO IMPACT See Note)
Requires fiduciaries of public retirement systems to make investment decisions based solely on financial factors. (6/30/25) (OR SEE ACTUARIAL NOTE APV)
Requires school systems to provide a salary increase for teachers and other school employees using savings attributable to the state's payment of certain unfunded accrued liability of the Teachers' Retirement System of Louisiana (EN INCREASE GF EX See Note)