Honoring the James Haggard Chapter of the National Society Colonial Dames XVII Century for its placement of a historical marker at the Durst-Taylor Historic House and Gardens in Nacogdoches.
Summary
H.R. 1109 is a simple congratulatory House resolution honoring the James Haggard Chapter of the National Society Colonial Dames XVII Century for placing a historical marker at the Durst-Taylor Historic House and Gardens in Nacogdoches. The resolution describes the organization’s mission of preserving historic records and sites, promoting colonial history, and supporting youth education, and it recognizes the group’s role in helping commemorate a local historic property.
The resolution also highlights the significance of the Durst-Taylor Historic House and Gardens, noting that it was built in 1835 near historic routes in Nacogdoches and is the second-oldest building in the city. It references the site’s use as a museum and its historic features, including a smokehouse, blacksmith shop, chicken coop, heirloom gardens, and sugarcane mill. The House directs that an official copy of the resolution be prepared for the organization as an expression of appreciation and respect.
Impact
H.R. 1109 does not change state law, create a program, appropriate funds, or impose any regulatory requirements. Its effect is purely ceremonial: it formally recognizes a private historical preservation organization and highlights a local historic site in Nacogdoches. The resolution may help raise public awareness of the Durst-Taylor Historic House and Gardens and the work of the Colonial Dames, but it has no direct legal impact on statutes, agencies, or affected parties beyond the honorary recognition.
Sentiment
The sentiment around the resolution is uniformly positive and supportive. The House adopted it by non-record vote, indicating no recorded opposition and suggesting broad agreement that the organization and its preservation work deserved recognition. The language of the resolution itself is complimentary, emphasizing heritage, patriotism, and the value of preserving local history.
Contention
There is no apparent substantive contention in the available record. Because the measure is a ceremonial resolution rather than a policy bill, there were no committee transcripts, no recorded votes, and no evidence of disagreement over legal or fiscal issues. Any discussion would likely have centered on the appropriateness of honoring the organization and the historical importance of the marker and site, rather than on competing policy positions.