H.R. 803 is a simple memorial resolution honoring the life of Charles Alfred Williamson of Tyler, Texas, who died on December 20, 2024, at age 55. The resolution recounts his background, including his education at The University of Texas at Tyler, his nearly 20 years of service with the Texas Department of Criminal Justice where he rose to the rank of warden, and his later work in staffing and recruiting. It also notes his long service as Rusk County Republican Party Chair from 2012 to 2024 and recognizes his family, faith, and community ties.
The resolution directs the Texas House to pay tribute to Williamson and extend condolences to his family, and it provides for an official copy to be prepared for them. It also states that when the House adjourns on the day of adoption, it does so in his memory. As a memorial resolution, it does not create or amend substantive law, regulate conduct, or appropriate funds; its effect is ceremonial and commemorative only.
Impact
H.R. 803 has no direct impact on state statutes, administrative rules, or regulated parties. It is a House resolution of tribute that serves a ceremonial function by formally recognizing an individual’s service and expressing condolences, rather than changing Texas law or policy. Its practical effect is limited to the official record of the House and the preparation of a copy for the family.
Sentiment
The sentiment around the resolution is uniformly positive and respectful. The bill was unanimously adopted by a rising vote of the House, indicating broad bipartisan agreement and no recorded opposition. The language of the resolution emphasizes gratitude for Williamson’s public service, sympathy for his family, and recognition of his contributions to his community and state.
Contention
There is no notable policy contention in the bill or the available legislative history. Because H.R. 803 is a memorial resolution, it does not appear to have generated debate over substantive issues, and there are no committee transcripts or recorded votes showing disagreement. Any discussion would have centered on honoring Williamson’s life and service rather than on legislative controversy.