Louisiana Senate Bill SB7

Louisiana 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/24/17
• Refer: 2/24/17
• Refer: 4/10/17
• Report Pass: 4/24/17
• Engrossed: 4/27/17
• Refer: 5/1/17
• Report Pass: 5/24/17
• Enrolled: 6/5/17
• Chaptered: 6/16/17
• Passed: 6/16/17

Caption

Provides for benefits for survivors of members killed in the line of duty by an intentional act of violence. (2/3 - CA10s29(F)) (6/30/17) (EN INCREASE APV)

Impact

This bill represents a significant adjustment to how survivor benefits are calculated for law enforcement officers, particularly those killed by intentional acts of violence. It ensures that surviving spouses will receive a benefit amounting to one hundred percent of the officer’s salary if their death results from such an act. This overarching change may require additional employer contributions to fund the program, thus impacting the budgets associated with the Louisiana State Police Retirement System.

Summary

Senate Bill 7 focuses on enhancing survivor benefits for members of the Louisiana State Police Retirement System who are killed in the line of duty as a result of intentional violence. The bill amends existing laws to provide clearer definitions and benefits related to the calculations of pension benefits for surviving spouses, minor children, and beneficiaries. It outlines specific provisions for different scenarios, such as the death of a law enforcement officer during their duties and the expected survivor benefits that should be afforded to their families.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 7 is largely positive among law enforcement groups and supporters of the bill who view it as a necessary step to ensure that families of fallen officers are adequately supported. Furthermore, there is recognition across various stakeholders that enhancing these benefits underscores the state's commitment to protecting those who serve in high-risk roles. However, discussions may surface regarding funding and the implications for taxpayer contributions to sustain the increased benefits.

Contention

While support prevails, potential points of contention might arise regarding the funding mechanisms necessary for implementing the bill's requirements. Some legislators may express concern about the reliability of funding through employer contributions and how it will affect overall contributions to the state's pension system. Additionally, the specific eligibility criteria and the bureaucratic implications of defining intentional acts of violence may spark debate among lawmakers and policy analysts.