Louisiana House Bill HR91

Louisiana 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/4/17
• Refer: 5/8/17

Caption

Directs the House Committee on Commerce to further investigate the current condition of economic development in this state concerning the RACER Trust's fulfillment of fiduciary obligations regarding the former General Motors Shreveport plant and operations

Impact

The resolution aims to address potential shortcomings in how the RACER Trust has managed its responsibilities. There is a clear concern that the Trust's actions may not have aligned with the best interests of Louisiana's economic development, as indicated by ongoing issues with declining sales and a lack of job creation since Elio Motors' involvement with the plant. The outcome of the investigation may have implications for existing state policies governing economic development and corporate responsibilities, driving reforms if breaches of fiduciary duties are uncovered.

Summary

House Resolution 91 directs the House Committee on Commerce to investigate the current condition of economic development in Louisiana, particularly focusing on the fiduciary obligations of the RACER Trust regarding the former General Motors (GM) Shreveport plant. The resolution acknowledges the vital importance of this facility, which historically generated considerable employment and economic opportunity for the region. It highlights past events, including GM's bankruptcy and the subsequent establishment of the RACER Trust, tasked with facilitating the redevelopment of the site and safeguarding public interests tied to it.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HR 91 reflects a deep concern for the future of economic development in Louisiana. Legislators and stakeholders emphasize the need for transparency and accountability from the RACER Trust. Some proponents of the resolution view the investigation as crucial to catalyzing economic growth, while others may see it as an opportunity to critique past government dealings with private entities. The atmosphere is one of cautious optimism, hinging on the investigation's findings and potential corrective actions.

Contention

Key points of contention revolve around the handling of the former GM-Shreveport plant by the RACER Trust and the subsequent choice to commit the site to Industrial Realty Group and Elio Motors. Critics argue that this decision may have sidestepped opportunities for more beneficial redevelopment partnerships. There are claims that fiduciary responsibilities were not appropriately honored, which could have resulted in significant economic losses for the local community, including missed chances for job creation that should have arisen from the plant's potential.